Comments by "Beau R" (@beaur252) on "U.S. To Isolate Ukraine? What's Behind Washington's 'Change Of Heart' Over Russia Conflict" video.

Then i guess russia shouldnt have started one.
5
:face-green-smiling::face-purple-crying: Thats what you call; a vodka induced stupor. lol
4
@fokthewef Russia started it no matter where in history you begin... They shouldnt have had "surrogate" cities in other countries in the first place. Mighty funny how they have them all over the ex ussr countries to keep them under their thumb. Russians belong in Russia. Not causing trouble in other sovereign nations because they dont like government decision making there.
2
@@alextim6961 I agree. THats why the west is giving ukraine so much money.
2
@briancarno8837 Of course they would. Only problem is, there is and never was any "hostile army" on russias border.
2
Lay off the dope kid.
2
ha ha ha. The chechens arent "in reserve" Theyve been in ukraine and moving backwards just like Russia. They also have a reputation of being inept just like the regular russian counterparts.. But dont worry, they will be back in homeland soon enough. ha ha ha.
2
Only defeat is Russia losing to the poorest nation in europe that has no real navy or modern airforce. lol. Us isnt currently in any war kid. Didnt do to well in school, did ya? lol:face-green-smiling:
2
@GaBeeLuv So what if it were 200 billion. Or 180 billion. Or 1 trillion. You throw around numbers just because they sound big, and have no understanding of what it really has to do with anything. lol. How much has russia spent on weapons for the last 20 years that they have stockpiled? lol High tech has big price tag. SOme missiles are over a million dollars for one. US spent 3 times that much on military last year alone and they arent even at war. China spends close to that 200 billion last year and they arent in any war currently where its necessary to constantly replace munitions and lost equipment. Also factor in the fact Ukraine has NO real navy. NO modern airforce and very very few long range missiles. They for the first half of the war didnt even have modern tanks or modern air defense or long range missiles! lol. Yet Russia couldnt take them!!!! So yeah, I dont see some huge advantage for poor little ukraine, who should be happy just not to get steamrolled by russia, but thanks to russian ineptitude, they are putting them in their place with much less weaponry and manpower.
2
@niburu1508 Uh oh, we have a Mr. Cranky Pants. Taking the Russia loss personally... Time to get out the extra strength depression meds. 💊
2
@Luofeng222 Those "tiny villages" add up when you take 20 of them, and russia takes nothing. ha ha ha.
2
Ha ha ha ha. You clowns must be REALLY desparate for material. ha ha ha. There has been no changes in action or in words of the US. They have said the exact same things since day 1. lol:face-green-smiling::face-purple-crying::text-green-game-over:
2
Uh, kid, those countries were all enemies and fought against by the US. lol. Last I looked US isnt fighting ukrainians. lol See, isnt history fun?
2
1. They saw russia military was absolutely DESTROYED in ww2 and it was only the USA that saved their very existence. They did so by supplying them and by fighting as well. Alone, Russia was deader than a road killed rabbit. 2. The largest nuclear arsenal is 100% meaningless when they will never use it. And USA has enough to destroy the world over.... How many more does anyone else need, and would it matter in any way at all? ha ha ha. No. So get a grip kid. 3.USA is by far the number one rated military on the planet as determined by every single legitimate military analyst on the planet. 4. Russia couldnt even beat the Mujahideen and they (as USSR) gave taliban a holiday (MUJAHIDEEN VICTORY DAY) by getting run out of afghanistan by them, then ussr immediately fell apart into 15 pieces afterwards. lol There. See? Isnt history fun?
2
@steveb890 Only reason russia isnt USSR is because of USSR losing the cold war and in afghanistan where they got spanked... and fell apart right after in to 15 pieces. lol
2
@user1qaz2wsx3edc Lot of good it is doing them now! Losing to poor little ukraine. ha ha ha.
2
Whatever it takes to help you sleep at night kid. ha ha ha. USA is still as strong as ever. Russia is now at about 50%. Losing to the poor country with no real navy or air force. ha hah a. So much for Russian pride. ha ha ha.:face-green-smiling::text-green-game-over:
2
@niburu1508 Is that what your psychologist has taught you? Good job! Keep up the good work! Stay positive! We are pulling for you...:person-turqouise-waving:
2
@jimmyc974 Uh oh... Looks like we have a "Mr. Cranky butt" that can't handle russias loss and is taking it personally. lol. ....Get out the depression meds! 💊💊💊💊
1
@savanthsunnyt Ukraine has retaken about half of the land Russia originally took. And russia only "took" it because they did so before ukraine was even ready to fight a war. Thats why russia hasnt gained one net millimeter in the last year and a half. lol
1
@jimmyc974 Why would they? Ukraine is achieving everything needed, and the wests interests, which are simply to degrade russias capabilities and economy are being realized with the current situation. So how could anyone justify the cost of a full blown war with russia for nato countries when the goals are already in progress???. Would be pure stupidity. Aside from that, the goal of degrading russia isnt important enough to any of them to start war with russia just for that reason... Ukraine wouldnt be fighting russia either if russia didnt attack them. Hope that clears up your confusion kid. Intelligent world leaders and their governments and advisors dont attack other countries just to show off their power or impress internet geeks.
1