General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Beau R
Hindustan Times
comments
Comments by "Beau R" (@beaur252) on "Taliban's Big Roar At U.S. After American Drone 'Enters Afghan Airspace' | Details" video.
Probably lost them among all the old burnt out soviet tanks there. Lol. Now called goat huts. Lol
4
@chanchalkumar2363 taliban was ruling afghanistan before US ever went their kid. Getting rid of them was never the goal. US went there to smash alquaeda. And goal was met. Taliban simply got in the way and paid for it.
4
@gurugemblunk all americas advancement caused US yo whip afghanis quicklhy and sent them into hiding for 20 years...allowed them to achieve their goal of smashing alquaeda. Allowed them to also smash over 50000 taliban troops. And allowed them to only lose 2400 men the entire time. Yeah, world record loss... only time in history a nation lost 20 times less men, achieved goal and lost war! Bahahaha.
3
Maybe they just remember they only lost 2400 men in 20 years while taliban lost 50000 hahaha
3
Ummm kid... US officially lost less than 2400 lives... not 6000 lol. And taliban lost 50000 and us achieved goal of smashing al quaeda... Thats why they spend the money and dont fight with clubs like the third world clowns. Lol
2
Taliban ruled before us got there. Taliban was never the goal. They just wanted to be difficult, got in the way, and got run over. They were permitted to have the wasteland afterwards... who else would want it??? Lol
2
2400 last time... How many wars in the last 100 years have had someone lose so few.? Lol. I dont know of any. Lol. And that was over 20 years! Lol US has more to be concerned about getting dead by eating a spoiled can of MRE than taliban getting them . Lol
2
@Khan.Afghan hard to lose when you only lose 2400 men in 20 years and other side losez 50k. Hahaha
2
@Jottoon411 the US did win. They accomplished the goal, controlled the country, left when the wanted and lost very few men. If that knock out wasnt a win, then nobody has ever won a war. Lol...
2
@Jottoon411 oh so your saying that the side that only killed 2400 troops in 20 years, lost 50000 themselves and hid most if those 20 years WON? Bahahahahaha!
2
@Jottoon411 nope. Only because they opposed the US going after alquaeda was taliban involved. The only reason US went there was for al quaeda. They were responsible for the terrorist attack on 9-11
2
@gurugemblunk russia already lost to afghanistan ... so they are no step up! USSR got smoked by afghanis in late 1980s.. they fell apart immediately after running out. Now just russia... afghanis even have a holiday now, every apri 28th, Mujahideen Victory Day. Ukraine has already tried russia and shown us all we need to know. They have around 1/1000th the weapons capabilities of the US. Not hard to figure out what would happen vs the US...and even worse if all of nato. Bad day for the bear...
2
Why? Scared because they whipped USSR in the 80s? US smoked them, 50000 tamiban eliminated sent them into hiding 20 years, and only lost a tiny number of men over all those years, 2400.
2
Does afgjanis really want their azes kicked and get sent into hiding for ANOTHER 20 years? Lol. Some just never learn....
2
@IsmailFakri why would they want any of their men to die and have to expend many more weapons? US has other obligations around the world and no real obligation to ukraine. Its much more damaging to russia to fight a long costly war than to be quickly pushec out anyway. Ukraine is doing a fine job.
2
@IsmailFakri its obviously not a short war. And its s very costly war for russia. Russia is also losing more men and equipment. Although they do have more to lose... At any rate, nato would like yo see russia damaged. Military capabilitywise and economy on into the future. And that is inevitably in progress. Those things i can guarantee you arr thee unspoken goals. Ukraine is doing a fine job. If nato was concerned with getting russia out quickly and efficiently, explain why US only gave 31 of their 5500 abrams.... nearly no long range munitions. No top end choppers. No jets. Only 24 of their hundreds of himars. Etc.. all the good stuff they gave very little or none of compared to their own supply. The rest of nato has given equally small portions of their supply other than rock bottom basics like artillery and short range missiles. If us were to get directly involved it would be over in a month, tops. If nato gave as much as they could with only ukraine doing the fighting russia would likely be out in 6 months.
2
@triniton8262 didnt do better??? Hahsha thats understatement if the year... Ussr lost 15000 men, and were going broke. Had ti leave the war without accomplushing goal, ussr fell apart immediately after...and afghanis have a national holiday to never forget: mujahideen victory day every april 28.... US lost only 2400 men in 20 years! Taliban ran and hid, every time they came out, were anihilated. 50000 taliban killed. The goal and reason for US being there was not ti deatroy taliban. They simply got in the way. They were there to smash alquaeda and that was accomplished. Ask bin ladin. There is not a single measure that points ti anything othet than a humiliating ussd loss and a win in extremely lopsided fashion for USA
2
Why would thsy do that when they said they left them because it was old junk 20+ years of hard desert use, and cheaper to leave than ti haul all back?
2
@ATMAuditor01 hid in mountainz 20 years and lost 50000 man, yet only killed 2400 US. Sorry kid, but facts dont line up with your story. Hahaha And nobody said the vehicles are usable. You can drivd a truck with littlr brakes snd 200,000 miles on the odometer also... but i wouldnt buy it. Lol Of course that still treasure to men used to riding donkeys. Haha
2
@Musicguy0007 uh.... they didnt want it. General milly explained that hard used junk wouldve been more expensive to haul all back home than it was actually worth. Makes sense, since they were there 20 years in a desert environment. And air support is importsnt part of any successful military. What do you want? Old british military style? Two lines of men facing each other in an open field with muskets with bayonettes?
2
@causticsauce9208 Comical how these desert dwelling clowns always talk so tough to far superior enemies they havd no chance of beating.... get the snot kicked out of them, and they never learn. Lol Centuries of inbreeding has clearly had maleffects on the portion of the brain responsible for controlling aggression and rational thought process.
2
Always smart to stick with what works
1
@Jottoon411 "2001 an international coalition led by the USA invaded Afghanistan to destroy terrorist organisation Al-Qaeda when the Taliban refused to hand over Osama bin Laden. British forces went in alongside US troops."
1