Comments by "Beau R" (@beaur252) on "U.S to fight Russia in Ukraine? Journo who exposed Nord Stream sabotage makes sensational claim" video.

  1. Sure they would. They probably lost more in some of the previous wars than they ever would against Russia. EVen though they never lost a ton, only shows their capability. This would be no different with these bungling fools that cant even beat ukraine, and wrech their own jets into drones. ha ha ha. So skilled in the art of warfare. lol.
    4
  2. And then RUssia run out of Ukraine faster than a scalded dog.
    4
  3. No less USAs business than it is RUssias.
    3
  4. Good thing is, they wont have a long way to ship them back to russia.
    3
  5.  @MrLeadb1  Hmmm. I must have missed that one. Only time i know of in afghanistan, Us totally destroyed them immediately, and held the country for 20 years, and only lost 3k men inn the process. ha ha. Maybe we can hold RUssia for the next 20 ha ha. Perhaps Putin will meet the same fate as quite a few AlQueda leaders did. :text-green-game-over:
    3
  6. Just as much as RUssia has in Ukraine.
    2
  7. ha ha ha ha.
    2
  8. Sure he will. He is a wussy. Hes not crazy.
    2
  9. ha ha ha ha. Impossible. But colorful story kid.
    2
  10. Ha ha ha. BYE BYE Russia! Want to see Russia FLY out of Ukraine? ha ha ha ha.
    2
  11. :face-green-smiling:
    2
  12. And is still losing it.
    1
  13.  @lebohangmokheseng9501  I dont give a damn if they are of zibabwe-an heritage. Ukraine is a sovereign state. USA has lots of people of Russian decent and a whole host of other countries as well. That doesnt mean each country gets to split USA 75 ways. for each section where someone of their bloodlines exists.. USA has every bit as much business there is what I said, but i was mistaken. They have MORE. THey are invited guests of Ukraine. Russia is NOT. :text-green-game-over:
    1
  14. Russia cant eve beat Ukraine and Putin isnt crazy, will not use nukes simply if he is run the hell out of Ukraine. Probably not at all even if US went even further, but thats a debate thats probably not necessary.
    1
  15. Facts.
    1
  16. Oh.. Is that what it is? I just thought since Russia whom cant even beat a third rate military in Ukraine, who is also beaten down when comes to men and equipment from a hard draining, over 1 year war, would be a little concerned about the #1 military in the world maybe getting involved directly. THen again, maybe Im wrong and youre right. Russia just wants to see if US has the ballz because Russia is so tough! :face-green-smiling:
    1
  17. A lesson on how to make bad decisions and destroying their own countries. Russia/ussr did the same during the cold war. Nearly destroyed in Germany also until USA saved their sorry hides.
    1
  18. No, he just knows that Putin, while an inept egotistical goofus, isnt a mad-man. He wouldnt press that nuke button any more than you would. Using them for leverage and blackmail, nothing more.
    1
  19. Only similarity might be the death totals. US 58,000 Vietcong: 1.1 million. Then again, maybe higher losses for Russia. They have no jungles to run and hide in....
    1
  20. The number one military, and richest nation in the world didnt get that way because they didnt know what they were doing.
    1
  21. :face-green-smiling: Is that what you tell your friends when they say how poorly Russian fighters are doing?
    1
  22. Yeah you are right. The Russian military is a bigger bungle-shmuck than any of those countries. US isnt fighting. But you will find out the big difference when the Air power, long range missiles and naval power arrive, all run by the best trained military in the world. ha ha ha.:face-green-smiling:
    1
  23. sorry kid. It may ease your embarrassment. But its Ukraine alot whipping that azz. USA enters with its full air power, naval power, long range missiles and the other toys Ukraine hasnt gotten, and best trained men in the world, and its lights out for the bear cub. ha ha ha.
    1
  24. :face-green-smiling:
    1
  25. It would stay in Ukraine. Russia knows what would happen to Moscow and a helluva lot of other parts of Russia as well. lol. They would take their chances in Ukraine and accept the results with a grain of salt, then go back to RUssia to whine about the USA and lick their wounds. It beats the alternative of having their azzes destroyed and their entire infrastructure back home also.
    1
  26. Sure they are. Its a straight up very conventional war with not alot of challenges. No jungles to hide in. NO Desert. Not even Russias home land so they dont have that advantage either. Russia cant open alot of fronts that they dont have access to... And occupying only 20% of it? And Russia being beaten down for over a year already? That my friend, would be a piece of cake. LIke US shooting ducks on a pond.
    1
  27. Sure they have. Russia would be like a minor conflict removing them from Ukraine. They cant even beat Ukraine with no real AIrpower naval power or long range missiles on th Ukraine side! ha ha ha.
    1
  28.  @niklaus9678  Try twenty percent son. lol. But whats 10% percent between a liar and a friend? ha ha ha. And they havent gained an inch in over 13 months now compared to what they occupied then. ha ha. THAT is PATHETIC! I see why you are emotional. That would embarrass the hell out of me also, having the world watch in amazement, while both rooting on Ukraine and laughing at your country. ha ha ha. The only country that ever lost in afghanistan is RUSSIA. ha ha ha. Run straight the hell up out of their by those goat wranglers. ha ha. Maybe you have forgotten. lol The funniest part will be the future, when kids in class learn about their country, and how it used to be called USSR, then fell apart, then became Russia. Then fell apart again and now is called ___________? Hope this clears up your confusion. 🍼
    1
  29. ha ha ha ha. Your jokes may pretend to ease your embarrassment over losing to a third rate military in Ukraine, but it wont save RUssia if the US of mother f'ing A gets involved. ha ha ha.
    1
  30. Yet they have all the friends and russia has none. GO figure..
    1
  31.  @MrLeadb1  Eastern United States has a nice ring to it...
    1
  32.  @christobosman5710  So Russia is gonna fight.... Get crushed immediately.. Have your leader and generals destroyed. And run into hiding from the US for 20 years also?All with extreme low USA loss of life? BEcause thats what happened in Afghanistan. ha ha Sounds good to me. Get Russia the F out and Russians wont have to be blown to bits.
    1
  33. Ha ha ha ha. More countries are supplying Ukraine than are supplying Russia (20 times more) so if anyone runs low on things, it would be Russia. Russia also cant even beat ukraine alone. No highly skilled US soldiers involved. None of USAs incredible air power. None of the US Incredible naval capability. No long range missiles. No - alot of things. lol. USA would wipe russia from the butt of Ukraine quicker than a man on chili night, with diarrhea wipes his az.
    1
  34.  @kleinnina1237  Your comical. Clear you are just trying to make yourself feel better. ha ha. Nato doesnt have to fight much trench warfare because its an antiquated concept. They have so much naval, and air capabilities as well as missiles that those in the trenches would be absolutely doomed. It would be an easier war for them than fighting small countries fighting "guerilla warfare" where the enemy hides among the population or in the deep jungles. A war like that in Ukraine would be an absolute feeding frenzy for the usa. And thats a fact. And Putin may be delusional and an inept fool, but he isnt going to nuke anyone. Hes not a mad man. A bluffer maybe. But bluffs were meant to be called by "winners".
    1