Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1. Oooo, "gifter!" It's the OED Word of the Year!
    1
  2. Well, she does have a child-voice. What's that about?
    1
  3. Look up Lula de Silva.
    1
  4. Yup. This channel's idea of news is gossip about other channels.
    1
  5.  @jocksharerock7318  Heh? Je ne te comprends pas. Je prefere Aude Lancelin.
    1
  6.  @jocksharerock7318  I don't have a television. I read, in three languages. Almost four.
    1
  7.  @jocksharerock7318  Who is Allysa Milano? Sorry if I misspelled that. I can't see your post as I write this.
    1
  8. But they are here to "educate" us.
    1
  9.  @humanbeing2420  And I said they weren't "spot on." Well, I didn't repeat the cliche, but . . .
    1
  10.  @humanbeing2420  But first you laid on the innuendo real thick. Wow. What goes around comes around, Bud.
    1
  11.  @humanbeing2420  Look up innuendo. Then reread your first sentence. That is worse than saying your schtick straight up, and out loud. And they are NOT "spot on" that Dore "harms" the progressive cause, as is obvious by the interest and support he has gained for this idea already, and from some of the best people. Looks like there is concern he might have disrupted a few career paths, however.
    1
  12.  @humanbeing2420  Look how everybody is talking about -- him!! Sad to say, that is not a sign that he is ineffectual. Sad, because it would be true even if this proposal were a horrible idea. Luckily, though, it's a very good one.
    1
  13.  @humanbeing2420  Innuendo? Did I hint? Insinuate? No. Said it straight up. Did I allude to vague, ambiguous, insider sources of information, like you suggested Sam would have access to? No. I looked at this video and your remarks. The texts we all can review. Nope. Not the same.
    1
  14. Among other things, Dore expected the Democrats to work to take back the Senate in 2018, not to expend their political capital on Russiagate, about which Dore was right. Dore expected too much from the DNC. They spent the four Trump years increasing their net worth, as would any rational lackey of oligarchs. In 2020, it looks like they still won't have the Senate. "Gee. How did that happen?" Ha.
    1
  15. Anything to say about the most recent bombing of non-whites? Anyone?
    1
  16. Do you know who Lula da Silva is? Does that ring a bell? No, huh?
    1
  17. You need to ask yourself why the DNC has mounted no actual resistance to ANY of this. That is the heart of the matter. Jimmy Dore is irrelevant. Stop trying to pretend like he's that important. That is ridiculous.
    1
  18.  @Atmost11  I didn't reference that clip. Dr. West did not appear in it, correct? Nor was there a discussion that included a doctor and a prominent health journalist (who have reservations about this idea, and don't make it about All Dore, All the Time), as Katie Halper presented. If Seder et al are opposed to Dore's style of commentary, they should not break the meter to imitate him and outdo him.
    1
  19.  @Atmost11  Do you know how to find stuff on YouTube? Real easy, use the magnifying glass icon. Do you know how people make clips of videos to show you what they want you to see? That's kinda how they make their arguments. Then if you want to know stuff, you have to look for what the other side has been saying as well. I'm sure you've heard about it.
    1
  20.  @Atmost11  What I saw from this panel was worse than embarrassing. At this point I'm frightened for free speech. Is there anything they won't say to destroy someone they don't agree with? I saw no limit, and I saw punching down. I don't see the same from Dore.
    1
  21.  @Atmost11  She never spoke to him or acknowledged Dore after being elected, on this or any subject. (She just went on his show before becoming popular.)
    1
  22.  @Atmost11  Complete nonsense. There is no path to Speakership for anyone worse and to the right of Pelosi. This argument counts on everyone's being totally ignorant. There was a point to voting against Trump no matter who was running against him. There is NO point to voting for Pelosi's right-wing agenda. Pelosi already passed over AOC for a committee chair, AND appointed a woman who withheld her vote from Pelosi the last time! Excellent, just what weak "progressives" deserve. Learn to fight for what's right. Show some spirit!
    1
  23.  @Atmost11  Skip the main points why don't you? 1. A Republican cannot be elected Speaker without Dem votes; and 2. Someone who withheld her vote from Pelosi, which AOC will not do, just got something AOC wanted. Precious, isn't it? I'm not against it. Where did I say I was? At this point, you are wasting my time.
    1
  24.  @Atmost11  Okay, we suck. Thanks.
    1
  25.  @Atmost11  Is there some reason why it's you who is apoplectic with fury? It didn't cross my mind to swear at you, as tedious and incapable of dealing with actual reasoned arguments as you are. I assumed you just don't have much experience in this area, not that "you sk." Oh well, good to know.
    1
  26.  @Atmost11  Katie's program invited a majority of guests who have expertise and were reluctant to embrace ForceTheVote, and they offered REASONS why. It isn't about personalities. Except for you and this channel.
    1
  27.  @Atmost11  No. I keep thinking this is about M4A.
    1
  28.  @Atmost11  Yeah, I saw character assassination. I saw Seder et al. say that a man who was a bricklayer for ten years and had a medical bankruptcy despite having health insurance is a "phony" because he got his first nice house at age 55. That's what I saw. If you didn't see that, I wonder why you think strong language FOR A REAL CAUSE is so bad.
    1
  29.  @Atmost11  Thank you for reminding us of what liberals are really like. They are never, ever allies of the working people, and instead despise them, and know they are easy marks for character assassination. Liberals/neoliberals open the door to fascism every time. This country already has those tendencies because of its slave society past and its deeply-rooted racism. Can you leave? I sure can. Those who keep lying will have to live in the stew of lies they cooked up. I pity them.
    1
  30.  @Atmost11  You can see Seder said that by watching the video! Oh gawd what a laugh. What has America come to?
    1
  31.  @Atmost11  Where have I said anything about her specifically? I don't care about her and knew she was not genuine in her pronouncements from Day 1. I had no expectations. She's a politician. That's not personal. It is a status. And her status has no bearing on the argument. Anyone else could be in the same office, and we would see the same conduct. Either you push a politician, or you pay a politician, or you do not exist for that politician. Fill in any name for "politician." Sorry to see you take things to heart in ways that blind you. Sorry there are 318,000 dead from COVID, and sorry there will be even more bankrupt because of it.
    1
  32.  @Atmost11  Actually, I pity you. I see you hold yourself out to be religious or something. Good to know.
    1
  33.  @Atmost11  Not what your profile says, LOL.
    1
  34.  @IncognitoSprax  SURE THEY DID: Fight to take back both chambers of the Congess in 2018, not waste time on Russiagate, and other Clinton projects.
    1
  35.  @jakecorenthose2901  Really? I hate anti-intellectualism.
    1
  36.  @ellharney3332  My response to another post, six months ago:  @Jake Corenthose  Well, then you will have to account for all the solid arguments advanced by Krystal Ball and Briahna Joy Gray, among others, for pursuing this strategy at this time. You'll also have to concede that the pandemic is real, has killed more people here than anywhere, has thrown millions out of work, and that a needed change that has been on the table for two generations has yet to be enacted using the old tactics. If you know a better way, absolutely suggest it now. No problem.
    1
  37. Sure. Try to preempt criticism of their position by falsifying it and exaggerating it, then shaming it, based on the exaggeration. A well-known technique.
    1
  38.  @mrbadguysan  I don't believe voting for Biden necessarily set the stage for a worse Trump "next time." It's a risk, certainly, but we don't have strong evidence for it. What we do have is incontrovertible evidence that every DNC candidate was worse than the previous one, in every election, for 40 years now. Something's got to give.
    1
  39. What did they say exactly? Show me in this video what they said. Defamation, harassment, and so forth are about actual words.
    1
  40.  @MichaelAronson  Is there some reason you don't want people to watch The Majority Report?
    1
  41.  @MichaelAronson  I expected something better than this. This was shameful. They are outright lying now, and for what?
    1
  42. This is what she got from these segments?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Russia HOMOGENEOUS??? Not since the 12th century. (By the way, who are the BRICS+?)
    1
  43. This was pathetic. False flag level, and unlike any left in France that I've ever seen.
    1
  44.  @jameshall9320   Taking a larger view, I guess that's not so bad. Either we end the age discrimination in Medicare, like every other civilized society, or US global prestige and hegemony take another hit. What's not to like? /s
    1
  45. ​@TheGrandy123 Did this video present the actual words used by Rowling et al? How do you know they were bullying her, and not criticizing the Olympics for its decision to allow her to box with non-intersex women? The words used matter. That's what charges of harassment, bullying, and defamation ride on. The words.
    1
  46. ​ @Keithdogyouknowitson Did they attack the athlete or the Olympic Committee that authorized the match? Attacks on the Olympic Committee should be free speech everywhere. We hear an interview from her, but not the actual words used against her or against allowing her to box by Rowling or Musk. So we don't know from this video what was said by these defendants. With this mentality, our First Amendment won't survive.
    1
  47. @peterschaeffer  Be that as it may -- then whole issue is the IOC. It's on them, not her.
    1
  48.  @peterschaeffer  She didn't rule on her own application.
    1
  49. Maybe Putin works for them. I bet the tiki torch bearers work for Sam.
    1
  50. Just how scared are you? You think a yard sign is reassuring?
    1