Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1.  @krinklyfig  Oh please. Pfft.
    1
  2.  @LP12576  Trick question. There is very little thinking going on here . . .
    1
  3.  @LP12576  Agreed.
    1
  4. Do you know who Lula da Silva is? Have you ever heard of Brazil, the country? Not a cosmetic procedure.
    1
  5. With what? Didn't you notice that this video didn't bother to tell you the exact words? That's what harassment and defamation are about: words.
    1
  6. This logic was already used against students for Palestine -- even the peaceful ones, basically saying what Bernie Sanders and Amy Goodman are saying.
    1
  7.  @connorlanker5952  I think his reporting sprung a former president of Brazil from jail, the socialist Lula da Silva, who is expected to run again and win. Let us know when you do something like that. Or, you could tweet more.
    1
  8.  @dertythegrower  He is plenty well known where he lives, and where his reporting sprung a former socialist president from jail by proving the charges were trumped up.
    1
  9.  @mckenzie.latham91  He left The Intercept. She writes for it.
    1
  10. He was on Democracy Now not too long ago, with Chris Hedges.
    1
  11. "F U Aaron Mate" -- said a woman If you criticize that, you are a misogynist. And Majority Report will call on YouTube to remove Jimmy Dore from the platform.
    1
  12. What's indefensible? Ana's smear of Aaron Mate, followed by this desperate attempt to deflect attention from what she did, by playing the sexual harassment card, over a crass joke for which she received a prompt written apology? Hm. Pretty much indefensible. I agree. Now Ana needs to apologize.
    1
  13. It is to them. They must actually live in a cul de sac of the mind.
    1
  14. Taking snippets is bad enough, but all right, they are at least accurate, though the color is mysteriously off. But why the misleading intro? This was NOT a podcast on impeachment at all, but a program about free speech and the limits of current First Amendment law to protect it. Why not say, "an interesting program on free speech took an odd turn?" Okay. You have a right to your opinions, but not to your own facts.
    1
  15. Did they attack the athlete or the Olympic Committee that authorized the match? Attacks on the Olympic Committee should be free speech everywhere. We hear an interview from her, but not the actual words used against her or against allowing her to box by Rowling or Musk. So we don't know from this video what was said by these defendants. Did you miss that part? With this mentality, our First Amendment won't survive.
    1
  16. @sandrols7  Nowhere did I say that defamation should not be available, if it applies. Of course it should. Do you know anything about defamation law in the US? Do you know why "opinions" are not actionable, in the US?
    1
  17.  @sandrols7  A discussion about first principles harms no one.
    1
  18.  @sandrols7  Fundamental rights don't matter? . . . How do you think university protests against arming the war on Gaza are shut down? They make some people feel unsafe. The rights you give up are ALWAYS your own.
    1
  19. @sandrols7  A discussion about first principles harms no one --- what part of that is elusive?
    1
  20.  @melanie1825  Where did you hear that she gave birth?
    1
  21. @peterschaeffer  Well, in that case, it lies at the doorstep of the IOC, not the athlete. She didn't declare herself eligible, she applied to compete like everyone else. It was up to them to rule properly. But to be clear -- I agree with all your points.
    1
  22.  @resourcedragon  I know. But this video is American and influences Americans.
    1
  23. ​ @templarw20 How many pro-Palestinian groups would be bankrupt?
    1
  24.  @pro-choicemom  Dore claims no expertise on Nicaragua. He invited Convo Couch to speak. Did you review what THEY said? If not, your identity has no bearing on the issue whatsoever.
    1
  25. @Badatallthis Stuff This is an example of why people should sue over defamation at least sometimes. I appreciate why Aaron chose not to, but a letter from his attorneys to TYT's producers would have ended it. Instead we have this nonsense. I agree with you. It is of no real interest.
    1
  26. This! 💯
    1
  27.  @ashkebora7262  I'm utterly stupid. You're the intelligent one. You know how to accomplish things, and when to give up and sputter swear words, ad hominem, and other invective, because that's just who you are. You're vastly too smart for me.
    1
  28.  @sailingthevic3966  Who watches her? This was my first time this year, and stumbled upon it due to the war.
    1
  29.  800mEric  So far, since the MARCH lockdowns, we have gotten a grand total of . . . $1800. This is a disgrace. Enhanced unemployment does NOT make up for it, as is evident everywhere. Not everyone profoundly affected qualifies for unemployment benefits. Lord, I know a sole practitioner lawyer with an Ivy undergrad degree who is getting $200 a week (!!) in paycheck protection. This, to maintain his office in his apartment. Absolutely unreal. What is wrong with these idiot politicians? What do they imagine their job to be?
    1
  30. Any time there is a war to divert attention from, or some horrendous domestic policy, up pops a juicy sex scandal. Never fails. 1. Syria isn't the issue. Dore blurting out one crass comment about a wardrobe malfunction SEVEN YEARS ago (for which he apologized right away) is the issue. 2. The management of COVID in New York, and the needless deaths, aren't the issue. Did Cuomo make women uncomfortable by hitting on them? He says he didn't mean anything by it. 3. Who cares about the extent or motivation of Bill Gates' relationship with Jeffrey Epstein? Did he try to date a Microsoft employee? 4. How crazy are you? How crazy do you think we are?
    1
  31.  @DragoonBoom  That this was a lazy video about a nonstory -- in stark contrast to what Briahna offers her viewers on a regular basis, for example. If you watched her, I think you'd know.
    1
  32.  @DragoonBoom  She interviews people like Cornel West and Eddie Glaude, and other leading thinkers.
    1
  33.  @GrahamBarth  Why didn't the Democrats prevent the last nomination? Whose job was that? Did they even try?
    1
  34.  @MrBungle4u  You must not listen to Dore with any regularity, then. Sam Seder has taken it upon himself to take down Jimmy Dore for some reason. I don't get it.
    1
  35.  @jon9428  Well, if all of that is true, why are you so upset? It should be obvious to everyone.
    1
  36.  @MrBungle4u  Okay. And Chris Hedges is crazy to go on his show, as is Max Blumenthal, recently Ro Khanna, etc.
    1
  37.  @wvu05  And had the House refused to approve increases to the debt ceiling, etc., or any other legislation that was essential for them to pass, as long as the Senate Republicans pressed ahead with any nomination after early voting had already begun, then what would have happened? Remember Nancy and the arrows in her quiver? (Remember how the Republicans played Obama?) But as it turns out, the only thing Nancy stopped was stimulus. Let's see what happens now, after 8 million more people slipped below the poverty line since July 2020. Bernie is pushing for $2000, as promised in the Georgia runoffs.
    1
  38.  @DavidSexton77  We can realistically hope.
    1
  39.  @chance2929  As long as they don't torture some folks . . .
    1
  40.  @MichaelAronson  Krystal Ball, Katie Halper, and Briahna Joy Gray are grown women. Are you a sexist?
    1
  41.  @friday6014  An example of what SHOULD be censored.
    1
  42. Is this show just gossip about other media? "Context" is an extremely vague word. "FYI"
    1
  43.  @butHomeisNowhere___  It's not sexual harassment. Not legally. It is inappropriate, which is why he apologized. In writing. Get it? So now it can be used against him.
    1
  44.  @BurnLikeAFlame  No. The point is to accuse someone on one very dubious person's word and to try to destroy his livelihood by having YouTube shut him down is not ethical.
    1
  45.  @BurnLikeAFlame  Or does that sound pretty good to you?
    1
  46.  @BurnLikeAFlame  Of the one joke, of course. There is his written apology. The other incident? Asking where Ana got her blue jeans? Y'know, the part where Ana takes a nasty swipe at Jimmy's wife, which these clowns omitted? It's in the part of Ana's DM that they didn't read. LOL
    1
  47.  @BurnLikeAFlame  That joke was inappropriate, and a person can get fired for that. But it does not rise to the level of "sexual harassment" under the law.
    1
  48. Either you push a politician, or you pay a politician, or you do not exist for that politician.
    1
  49. Yes. They'll make money on oil futures.
    1
  50. Or her dad will, for her.
    1