Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Is Joe Rogan Complicit In The Ivermectin Grift?" video.
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@omnibus5359 Well, then you didn't see the full JRE program I'm referring to, which Rogan made after he recovered. Not Instagram.
Obviously Dr. Gupta was not his source concerning MSM production techniques. He is a doctor, he was there to discuss COVID. On that note, the current NIH website states, "There is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19." (emphasis added) It recommends further trials, and discusses the rationale for studying it. The Indian government distributed it, en mass, and against WHO advice, as prophylaxis. I've never seen definitive information on the outcome, assuming we can avoid a post hoc fallacy.
Are you sure you're up to date? :)
1
-
1
-
@omnibus5359 Sloganeering. I practically know the essay by heart. I taught it frequently. Who's pretending some sort of "culture clash?" Posturing has a long and (ig)noble cultural tradition here. And who brought up conspiracy? Well, other than you!
If you mean story, say story. If you mean claim, say claim. If you mean subject, say subject. If a word with an Anglo-Saxon root has greater specificity, then ditch the more general and fuzzy but pretentious Latin root.
Bad enough you have to say "narrative." Now I'm treated to "SPIN a narrative!"
And "the narrative being changed is that . . . " Wow, I've heard of passive voice/agentless sentences, but this one is in a class by itself. I'll have to write this down, it rocks.
I don't know what those insider acronyms mean. (Orwell mentions that, too.) I gave you the information. Look it up yourself, or don't. I've also demonstrated that your comments on ivermectin are somewhat misleading, in light of what NIH says -- not that any celebrity testimonial should ever be given weight, either.
What a zoo. LOL . . .
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@galvanaut7119 That study, which is the best one so far, compared myocarditis in all vaccinated, in all unvaccinated, and in all COVID cases. Not in the demographic that accounts for the unusual concentration of myocarditis from vaccination, which also happens to include minors.
I concede that in the review of research I did yesterday, I have found no confirmation of my position OR of yours, and very little information on myocarditis deaths in either the vaccinated or the COVID sufferers, except that they have happened. The only evidence in favor of your general position in favor of vaccinating people who account for a tiny fraction of a percent (about 0.075%, see Statistica) of all COVID deaths is that vaccine-induced myocarditis is very likely to be significantly less serious than myocarditis in COVID sufferers, and likewise endocarditis. Again, no demographic information -- but that could be because it is true across demographic groups. But it does not support your claim concerning relative incidence in teenaged boys. Can you?
Do you know what the current FDA warning on the mRNA vaccines says? I haven't looked.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1