Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "The Guardian DEMANDS World War III To Stop Putin" video.

And of course Jeremy Corbyn.
36
@chiragpatel2423 Painted Assange as Putin puppet, operative, or stooge, and pretended his incarceration was either no big deal, or essential to upholding Feminism.
27
And people thought that when The Guardian destroyed Jeremy Corbyn it was a shame but not a sign of worse things to come. Oh brother.
8
And for what? RAW MATERIALS, of course.
5
This guy isn't kidding. The West ALWAYS goes to war for raw materials.
5
They are bought and think you are bought. "Everybody is bought."
4
@Aqua Fyre Well that's a good reason to spread vicious lies about him. By all means smear away for the Greater Good.
4
@kevinoneill2250 Va te faire . . . On ne permet pas que je termine ma phrase comme je veux.
3
He wrote this. Hence he may have access to a bunker.
2
💯🌟🌟🌟
2
@norman7527 🤣
2
@kevinoneill2250 Thanks for responding. Now I can block you from my notifs.
1
@kevinoneill2250 They find room in undisclosed locations for "journalists" like this Guardian twit. I can't afford America, nevermind a bunker. Good thing I speak languages and stuff.
1
@kevinoneill2250 en + c*l + er C'est simple.
1
Snoopy: "It was a dark and stormy night."
1
The guy isn't kidding. The West ALWAYS goes to war for raw materials.
1
They think they're smart, so you must be stupid. Do you do actual WORK, for less money than they make? Well then.
1
@Aqua Fyre Your post I was responding to is no longer visible. We should all agree that is bad.
1
@Aqua Fyre Not at all. You didn't know that it's ordinary for YOU to see your own post, but for others not to? Since you're going to be snippy about it, I'll return in kind: you haven't been paying attention.
1
@mE-zx7pt You're right. Maybe it's a good sign, too. They shouldn't pay so much attention, to this! I mean let's get real. :)
1
@Aqua Fyre Nope.
1
@Aqua Fyre When you wrote this, there were 20 replies logged, but 17 visible. I remember you had said Corbyn could never win, but in more colorful language. My response is that is no grounds to smear him. Tell the truth about __ (fill in the blank) to show he is unqualified to lead. Okay. Nevermind. Rush Limbaugh and Rupert Murdoch did not get rich that way.
1
@Aqua Fyre Found it in my feed -- well, the beginning, not the whole post. You called him a "nut job" and said he could never win an election when obviously, he did. 🤣
1
@Aqua Fyre He was a Member of Parliament. He was the leader of the Labour Party, a position he won, for five years. The Blairites looked to sabotage him from the very beginning because of the threat they thought he represented to their holding on to their ill-gotten lucre -- and Corbyn was to blame for attempting appeasement. As soon as his supporters suspected he would be nothing more than a milquetoast, feckless, diluted version of Blair, with possibly a little tinkering around the edges, but only if the banks gave permission, of course they fled. Who wouldn't? For all his many and obvious flaws, and his quite checkered past, a George Galloway would never stoop to that. He knows how to open his mouth. I'm not British, though I should be. My father and my mother's only brother were veterans of the British Army, WWII, and I cared for my father as the ravages of that war resurfaced during his old age. You're welcome.
1
@Sealia77 I can't anymore, either. In fact, almost all of his posts that I replied to are now in visible.
1
@chiragpatel2423 I don't recall that they did prior to the 2017 elections, but I would have to research it. Questions about what Assange actually did in Sweden, and whether the warrant issued there was pretextual, or not, were certainly legitimate when first raised. Once you had witnesses to Assange's various alleged misdeeds falling away, and the UN stating that it it not regard his continued incarceration as warranted, all of these issues were clarified and the Guardian's continued criticism of him (and indifference to his human rights) became indefensible. This is a very general summary; for a solid answer, I'd have to do the research. Chris Hedges has done some of the best reporting on this case.
1
@jmwoods190 I've heard one of them consistently support vaccination over age 50, or for anyone with comorbidities. This is "not enough" for them, apparently. Anyone who does not emit the prescribed lies must be stopped.
1