Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Appellate Court DESTROYS Trump’s Prosecutor- Ready To TOSS OUT $450 Million Verdict!" video.

  1. They almost certainly have immunity.
    9
  2. ​@lordkuriki5475 ANY attorney can be sanctioned by the court for improperly bringing a case. That doesn't mean they can be held liable for malicious prosecution. Sanctions by the court are for the purpose of regulating the officers of the court. An AG who gets sanctioned can be fired, or, if they are elected, impeached, or they can be removed from the ballot or voted out. That doesn't mean they can be held liable, in a civil suit or a criminal prosecution. Those are two different things. LOOK IT UP.
    5
  3. ​​ @LetholdusKaspyr I was responding to a post that brought up treason. The @ got erased.
    5
  4. ​ @LetholdusKaspyr A prosecutor usually can't be held liable for their prosecutorial decisions.
    4
  5. @lordkuriki5475  So someone tweeted something? Is Twitter/X a lawbook now? Smh
    3
  6. ​ @LetholdusKaspyr If she did that, she should have been disciplined by the Bar, and the whole fiasco might have been avoided. No, something circulated on X is evidence in COURT only if you can prove its authenticity and a chain of custody. It requires sworn testimony in its support to be considered evidence. The more AI we have in the world, the stricter the evidence rules are likely to be.
    3
  7.  @ssusdorf1  Show me the elements of treason.
    3
  8. ​ @LetholdusKaspyr Prosecutors usually have immunity from suit for their prosecutorial decisions.
    3
  9.  @LetholdusKaspyr  False. Look it up.
    2
  10.  @ssusdorf1  Show me where anyone involved met the elements of treason.
    1
  11. @Featherfinder  As you well know, that's disallowed here. You mean you can't look up malicious prosecution and immunity and figure it out? Say, for example, you see a recent article in a specialized legal publication or on an attorney's website that says something like, "absolute immunity for prosecutors needs to end;" would we then realize that it must be a thing? And a controversial one, at that? Try it. Test yourself.
    1
  12. @Featherfinder  Conservative judges are not doing the weaponizing? You must have missed all the qualified immunity cases for extreme misconduct by government officials at all levels, in violation of all sorts of rights, even free speech. Deterence against engaging in anything short of a violent crime or a criminal conspiracy has been significantly undermined.
    1
  13. @Featherfinder  See whether you can find Price v. Montgomery County. That's another possibility, lol. That was the case that was supposed to limit immunity. Oh well.
    1
  14. @bruce9648  Not at all. Nothing about her surprises me. I explained what counts as evidence in court and why. Read it again. For all we know, she has done worse. But I'm not clear on what criminal law she broke with that statement. Remember when Trump said, "Lock her up?" That was not a crime. It was free speech. Granted, for a prosecutor to do it is actually worse. The bar undoubtedly has a rule against that type of campaigning. But that means a reprimand and a mark against her law license. Anyway, real court isn't like social media court.
    1
  15.  @Hemiboybr549  Sorry you're mad that I know stuff.
    1
  16. @bruce9648  Not at all. Nothing about this surprises me. I explained what counts as evidence in court and why. Read it again. But I'm not clear on what criminal law she broke with that statement. Remember when Trump said, "Lock her up?" That was no crime, it was free speech. Granted, for a prosecutor to do it is actually worse. The bar undoubtedly has a rule against that type of campaigning. But that means a reprimand and a mark against her law license. That is a public record, too.
    1
  17. They almost certainly have immunity. Think for a minute.
    1
  18. @AntonioRivera28  Well it's nice to think . . . YES THEY DO They do not have immunity from criminal charges, were they to commit any crime, but their judicial acts are absolutely immune from any liability. LOOK IT UP
    1
  19. @AntonioRivera28  Well, you're entirely wrong. You're not even going to try to look it up, are you? You're just going to guess. I hope you won't be too disappointed by the absence of any lawsuits or criminal charges against him, because there will be none. He could, of course, lose his job. That could always happen.
    1
  20.  @AntonioRivera28  You think there's an Eighth Amendment violation?? 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  21. @AntonioRivera28  In the US, capital punishment for 16 and 17-year-olds was finally struck down as too harsh in 2005.
    1
  22.  @AntonioRivera28  I know it isn't. That's never an 8th Amendment violation. Can you be serious? Capital punishment for juveniles, or profoundly retarded, or very sick and unlikely to live long are 8th Amendment violations. No, a fine under 1/2 billion for a billionaire doesn't qualify.
    1
  23. @AntonioRivera28  Look up Price v. Montgomery County, Kentucky. The prosecutor deliberately told a witness to destroy evidence that the court ordered the witness to turn over to the defense. An innocent man spent two years in jail while suffering from cancer and later died. The prosecutor was immune from a civil rights suit for damages. Hmm 🤔
    1
  24.  @Scramble4r  It is still not an 8th Amendment violation by any stretch.
    1
  25. Lemon laws apply to auto dealers, not private sellers. Too dumb.
    1