Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Michael Malice Brings Anarchy To The Jimmy Dore Show" video.

Malice looks like a classic CIA plant. Remember who turned out to be -- review that list. Well, he resembles them. No idea if he is, that's not my claim.
3
Oh please, he is entertaining but he is such a phony.
3
@kevinschmidt2210 Based on long experience. I've watched his many long interviews, from start to finish, and I can spot it. Watch for yourself -- especially since you find it fun. It's in the subtleties. I can't go back to a 3+ hour Lex Fridman video and time stamp it for you. He reminds me too much of the people who turned out to be CIA, some well known and some I've known personally.
3
Oh no. Please.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 Obviously, this is just an opinion. He has a good sense of humor, I don't deny the entertainment value. His comparison on authenticity with most other people in this space suffers. I think everyone should read Finks, or The Cultural Cold War.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 No I'm not. I'm just a multilingual person who reads a ton. I appreciate that you are not used to people like me. But do read Finks, and The Cultural Cold War. And do watch those long-form videos, and see whether some little contradiction -- some little something -- starts to nag at you. Whether a person is trustworthy is not ad hominem at all, but important to consider; what argument of his have I attacked on the basis of the fact that he is the one advancing it? After all 2 + 2 does not cease to equal 4 even if a Hitler were to say it. I just wouldn't take certain people's word for it.
1
@johanstinson It would take too long to watch his interviews again, as you well know. I do remember that he claimed that his latest book was the first to treat the subject of crimes under communism, and that it was essential that someone do this. It was probably on Lex Fridman. That is such a howler that it's not even remotely amusing. Most of his stuff is highly derivative.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 Celebrity culture fan clubs are so puzzling. Tell me, did you ever stand up for a real person, like a friend or a coworker, the way you do for celebrity strangers? I would bet money that you never have and probably never will. Doing that could cost you. This is free. I mean, speaking of keeping it real.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 No, I haven't "doubled down," used ad hom, or "ad Hitlerum." You need to do some reading. Or, maybe my responses were subjected to sense or ship, so you don't know that I did provide evidence. That could happen. LOL I see I did strike a nerve. But why is there a nerve? This is what I still don't get. I do know to block YOU, however. Thanks for letting the world know.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 I cited Malice's claim that his latest book addresses communist crimes for the first time, and that people need to know about them. That is a specific assertion I remember well, and its purpose is obvious. If that isn't abject, I don't know what is. What a howler.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 I still remember when I was subjected to cyberstalking and threats for daring to suggest that Arnold Schwarzenegger might not be a good choice for governor. 🤣 Those were the days . . .
1
@kevinschmidt2210 So, tell us all about when you did stand up for a real person, not a celebrity. What did you do? (Did you lose money, or make money?)
1
@varsityathlete9927 Have it your way. I have some experience in this, more than I would have liked to have had, and I did give a specific example in Malice's case. Did that get censored, or just overlooked by you? I guess you misunderstood. I wasn't playing victim, I was saying there are people online who are that weird with their celebrity nonsense that a perfectly appropriate observation can set them off. When a person presents themselves as an podcaster and public figure, and even a public intellectual, they are inviting critique. I have every right to state my impressions. Why was I attacked personally for it? It doesn't make sense. You want to shut ordinary people up, and give these clowns the podium? Why? If you are an anarchist, isn't that the opposite of what they preach. I wish this didn't exist. It certainly does. When I first heard about Gloria Steinem's CIA ties, I was incredulous. Well, it was true. I suggest you do some reading and closer observation. You may remember this some day and realize how naive you were. More and more "impossible" things are true every day. Finks and The Cultural Cold War -- a word to the wise. Then apply what you've read to the best of your discernment. I'm doing you a favor. You should thank me.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 I certainly did give an example. Neither you nor I know what's shadow banned; it's still visible to me. Why did you assume I'm a man, by the way? Is there anything you guessed right? High school critical thinking -- oh brother. I have a JD, among other things. You need to brush up on your Latin phrases. When a person presents themselves as an podcaster and public figure, and even a public intellectual, they are inviting critique. I have every right to state my impressions. Why was I attacked personally for it? It doesn't make sense. Why don't you simply disagree and leave it at that? You want to shut ordinary people up, and give these clowns the podium? Why? If you are an anarchist, isn't that the opposite of what they preach? Interesting -- Glenn Greenwald got this mobbing for questioning Lex Fridman, although one aspect of his guest's critique of Lex was misplaced, so there is at least something there to push back against. Looks like anyone associated with Joe Rogan is off limits. Maybe you are just very, very naive. That could be it. Have you ever stood up for a real friend, in real life, or only for Celebrities here? You need a king to feel secure, maybe? This is too fluid for you?
1
@kevinschmidt2210 You've done me a favor. I'm never going to watch Jimmy Dore again. Thank you, I was wasting my time.
1
@johanstinson I gave a reason as well, concerning his promotion of his latest book, which was utterly phony. Your first full paragraph, on the other hand, has no facts, just your opinion. What reasons for considering him smug, etc., did you just give? Moreover, I invited others to watch him and see for themselves. Of course you're entitled to your opinion, but I see no reasons, or examples of what you found so smug or condescending. It was only when I said, "this is just my opinion" that the other guy thought he noticed a weakness, and swooped in, calling me the phony. This is usually how interactions in this society play out. This is a move that works. Ask yourself why it worked on you.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 Here, let me help you out on the critical think front: the way you argue the point is not to start screaming, "YOU'RE the phony!!!! Mudslinging!!!!!" It is to say something like, "that is a very serious charge that requires very serious/airtight evidence. Even a kid who stole something resents being accused of stealing unless you can prove it -- and rightly so. You have no proof except your impressions. Why should anyone trust that?" My answer: Fair enough, I don't have proof. But once you've seen this done in many other contexts, you start to see a pattern. Media is in a bad way right now, and heavily infiltrated, so I am going to say something. The CIA in particular has a long-standing practice to create "alternative" media as a false flag. I think that's too important not to signal. They always take over whatever media has cultural prominence, and twist it to their purposes. If you don't believe me, look into it for yourself. That is their practice. It's not new. At least be vigilant. The alphabet agencies have been overreaching everywhere, but especially where podcasts, YT, and stuff like that is concerned, because it exploded in popularity in short time. Things are not what they seem. See? You're welcome.
1
@kevinschmidt2210 BTW, speaking of sense or ship, lots of your posts are missing. I didn't complain, and I don't see why they decided to shadow any of them.
1
@varsityathlete9927 What is "glowing?" Let's see. If I don't give "reasons" that's bad. If I do, that's worse. (Actually, I agree.) Okay, whatever you need. I block this thread now. You should print it out, and show it to an objective person, perhaps even a medical professional. Sorry you're jealous, but that's what drives the capitalist system. Do your part! :) (Say, wonder why they need "Malice's" latest book so bad? Hm . . . ? Nah, can't be that. Can it? Vive la revolution.)
1
@varsityathlete9927 BTW, I don't know whether you are two unique people, having no association of any kind with an alphabet agency. I don't say you aren't. I reserve judgment, and would rather bet ten bucks on a lotto.
1