Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Social Media CENSORING Hunter Biden Article!" video.

  1. When an ordinary person is literally defamed on social media, proved in court, and that person is shunned and loses job opportunities and friends, what happens? Nothing. There is no social media initiative to assist that person. Social media have zero responsibility, and zero good will. But telling the TRUTH about the Bidens is censored right away, Funny how that is.
    7
  2. WELL SAID
    4
  3.  @Asgard2208  All decent people have to contemplate leaving the US at this point, to remove themselves from its imperialist project and the propaganda that goes with it. Thanks for the reminder.
    2
  4. Not the main point of the story at all. 11:55 As Greenwald has also said, the alleged emails contain no "bombshells." We knew Hunter trades on his father's name.
    2
  5. Trump won't win.
    1
  6. Joe Biden is a crook . . . so the DEMS want to make him President . . .
    1
  7. Um, that's a tough argument.
    1
  8. So . . . the neo-Nazi militia men are "socialists?" Socialists are not universalist, who support equality among all peoples, and instead want to confer benefits on others based on their membership in a supposed "race," and their "racial purity?"
    1
  9.  @Asgard2208  I'M conflating? You conflate the NAZIS with "socialists" based on branding, which is as flimsy as it gets. I'm not surprised that people who are unfamiliar with 20th century history might do that, or who have been fed talking points by Fox News, but to see you do it was frankly a surprise. As for Jimmy's point, Nadine Strossen's recent book on hate speech makes essentially the same point: these speech codes, which on their face come across as feel-good nicey nicey progressive, end up being used by the right to silence the left, in the modern developed democracies. She is about as extreme a First Amendment absolutist as I have ever seen, and I do not agree with her completely, but I respect her the most. Anyone who wants to propose the smallest restrictions on freedom of speech really must read her book and meet her arguments first. Also, after reading her, I can better pinpoint where I would argue for stronger protections: that would be in workplace, the hostile environment standard. (Not in the free press, that is for sure!)
    1
  10.  @Asgard2208  Okay. Now I see who you are. Never mind.
    1