Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Due Dissidence" channel.

  1. ​ @truth1013  LOL
    1
  2. @tjallingdalheuvel126  These are public information. And Musk and Thiel are among the largest federal contractors in the world.
    1
  3. Believe it.
    1
  4. ​ @Guy-d2e U of Michigan Law School took this case in their innocence project. This isn't news at all.
    1
  5. ​ @MidnightMedia_ Only a president from the same party could influence a governor. That's one thing. The Frontline documentary The Confessions shows how Hillary's future running mate refused four innocent service members. This is how these things go.
    1
  6. Chauvin pled guilty to TWO separate charges in TWO distinct cases for which he was charged in the federal indictment.
    1
  7. 💯
    1
  8. Billionaires spend more on lobbying and on elections than they spend on taxes. They get the laws they want. Then they get government contracts and buy US Treasuries, and WE owe THEM our taxes, on the contracts and in interest on the national debt. Keep repeating it until it sinks in.
    1
  9.  @1974Qball  Billionaires spend more on lobbying and on elections than they spend on taxes. They get the laws they want. Then they get government contracts and buy US Treasuries, and WE owe THEM our taxes, on the contracts and in interest on the national debt. Keep repeating it until it sinks in.
    1
  10. @ericaugust1501  Sure honey. And you can also see ______ posts.
    1
  11.  @Hands2HealNow  They are disallowed, as was my actual substantive reply.
    1
  12. @ericaugust1501  This is the real fake news, making absolutely certain no one understands anyone or can come to agreement. This isn't even accomplished through AI yet. We're at the lowest rung, and it's working.
    1
  13. Normal people don't.
    1
  14. Why doesn't he explain free speech fora on campus to her? Educate her. Why is he afraid to say a word? This is freedom? This??
    1
  15.  @mattboyer3385  Well, just to be clear, a war or major economic disruption could be caused by Country A, and migrants come to Country B for reasons that have to do with ease of access, which includes geography. Country B need not bear any responsibility for the war, etc.
    1
  16. @HazeOfWhearyWater  We can expect a lot of people losing their jobs. Whether they should or not, and especially if they shouldn't. Those people are in the way.
    1
  17. Since Marbury v. Madison, it is the federal courts who state what the law is. They can preserve the status quo on all sorts of things pending a hearing, and this one was set for February 14. Nineteen states brought suit in a court of competent jurisdiction. What happened to state's rights?
    1
  18.  @crimony3054  Where did you go to law school?
    1
  19. France has more smoking and more cancer and a significantly longer life expectancy. Several European countries have higher cancer rates than the US, longer life expectancies and a better quality of life. There's nothing remarkable about that.
    1
  20. P. S. The women on that court are legends.
    1
  21. The technical reason it is not a Ponzi scheme is that the new dollars coming in are taxes from salaries that generally keep pace with the overall economy (and when they don't, people in the labor force have options to rectify that), whereas the payouts do not. Social Security benefits are never raised to account for the full impact of inflation. Hence, the benefits depend on the salary you earned pre-inflation, for the rest of your life, and the only sure way to rectify that is to return to work. That's not a Ponzi scheme. You're welcome. Please clap.
    1
  22.  @DeSmith-o4b  Those have nothing to do with this.
    1
  23.  @DeSmith-o4b  Have they discussed why 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty) does not apply? That's the basis of jurisdiction.
    1
  24. You could go to the actual websites and see the press releases from that time, or even find pdfs of court documents.
    1
  25. The women aren't. That makes four.
    1
  26.  @the3rdMan8  You got me.
    1
  27. His parents named him "Gavin." Whereas Aaron's . . . 😂
    1
  28. This is exactly how these fake ideologies work. Try a few Adam Curtis documentaries, but don't believe him. Take notes, do the research. See what you find.
    1
  29. ​ @Kittypaws90  Let me ask you something. Why are posts that explain this routinely _______ ? I'll try again right below.
    1
  30. Billionaires spend more on lobbying and on elections than they spend on taxes. They get the laws they want. We don't. Then they get government contracts and buy US Treasury bonds, and WE owe THEM our taxes, on the contracts and in interest on the national debt. Keep repeating it until it sinks in.
    1
  31. Now you know how people of modest means got property in California: they inherited it. Megan Markle's mother did, and lived there for a long time. Imagine being 90, and living in the same house for 75 years.
    1
  32. ​@jeffhicks8428 U of Michigan took this case a long time ago, in their law school's innocence project.
    1
  33. He signed off on trans for his minor son. Listen, I get it. Good psychotherapy, second opinions, massive nutritional interventions -- who can afford all that?
    1
  34. Next up, settling MARS!! 😂😂😂
    1
  35. Contact a real innocence project first and ask them. U of Michigan accepted this case.
    1
  36. Nineteen states brought this suit. Didn't you see the order? Don't you believe in states' rights?
    1
  37.  @Rev_Danielle  Yeah, with real 💰
    1
  38.  @cyberft  What you just said is a logical fallacy: tu quoque
    1
  39. @terry4137  Correct. They must hire me and pay me VERY well for me to defend them. In fact, I still may not do it.
    1
  40.  @cyberft  I see what you mean now. But how does that refute OP? "You're doing it, too" is not a refutation. It may be relevant to the credibility of the person speaking, but *if* the merit of what he's saying isn't dependent on his credibility, then it doesn't matter.
    1
  41.  @terry4137  Too bad my reply is _________.
    1
  42.  @cyberft  No it isn't. It's not reasoning, so it doesn't have to "follow." You disagree with the value statement. That's fine. But that doesn't refute it. How about "People who defend ____ are morally bankrupt," and try substituting: Jeffrey Epstein, the Manson Family, etc. Now you might agree.
    1
  43. ​@cyberft  I'm trying to edit to get past the c__. No it isn't. It's not reasoning, so it doesn't have to "follow." You disagree with the value statement. That's fine. But that doesn't refute it. How about "People who defend ____ are morally bankrupt," and try substituting: the Manson Family, etc. Now you might agree.
    1
  44. @cyberft  I explained the logic very carefully, but guess who is opposed to logic? (Sometimes it appears if you sort by Newest and scroll, but who wants to do that?) Sometimes you get to see it posted on your feed, but no one else can. Fun with billionaires, lol.
    1
  45. He father has some African ancestry, yes.
    1
  46. An Englishman and a Canadian are going to rescue the republic. Man, it really is over, innit?
    1
  47. Kim is awesome and stands tall on many topics. Why she periodically invites kooks to her show like that tax evader -- who literally lied with no pushback from her -- I will never understand. Yes, literally lied. I looked up court documents. If he himself doesn't serve time for his convictions, there might be an alphabet agency reason. But people who follow his advice will. I've seen it happen.
    1
  48. You believe a podcaster?? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  49. ​ @Tartersauce101 I didn't believe her. I went straight to a search engine and believed U of Michigan.
    1
  50.  @jamesgarvey8402  Oh, look! My explanation of precisely why Musk is wrong is not visible! Huh! Maybe if we sort by Newest and then scroll, they might let us see it? They do that a lot, in solidarity with fellow b_____ .
    1