Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "" video.

  1. Did you read the briefs? Then you don't know. Every brief in every federal court must correctly establish the court's jurisdiction over the case. The court will then address its jurisdiction before ruling on any issue in the case.
    5
  2.  @lachlanbell8390  What made you draw that conclusion? 😂
    4
  3. Take a look at Clinton v. City of New York, where the Court struck down the line-item veto as unconstitutional. Justice Stevens wrote that opinion, and he was appointed to the Court from the Seventh Circuit, too. The Seventh has this reputation, as being more intellectual overall and less likely to be partisan.
    3
  4. @lachlanbell8390  No, just talking about jurisdiction doesn't make you right. All nine Justices take jurisdiction into account always.
    3
  5. @lachlanbell8390  It's based on federal statute, as usual. It's our agency.
    3
  6. @DeSmith-o4b  No, start with Court Listener and read the complaint.
    3
  7. Even a line-item veto by the President is unconstitutional.
    2
  8. @tjallingdalheuvel126  These are public information. And Musk and Thiel are among the largest federal contractors in the world.
    1
  9. P. S. The women on that court are legends.
    1
  10.  @DeSmith-o4b  Those have nothing to do with this.
    1
  11.  @DeSmith-o4b  Have they discussed why 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty) does not apply? That's the basis of jurisdiction.
    1