Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "" video.

  1. This video shows why Musk and Vivek are so useful to Trump. When this implodes, Trump's fans will blame them.
    3
  2.  @cyberft  What you just said is a logical fallacy: tu quoque
    1
  3. @terry4137  Correct. They must hire me and pay me VERY well for me to defend them. In fact, I still may not do it.
    1
  4.  @cyberft  I see what you mean now. But how does that refute OP? "You're doing it, too" is not a refutation. It may be relevant to the credibility of the person speaking, but *if* the merit of what he's saying isn't dependent on his credibility, then it doesn't matter.
    1
  5.  @terry4137  Too bad my reply is _________.
    1
  6.  @cyberft  No it isn't. It's not reasoning, so it doesn't have to "follow." You disagree with the value statement. That's fine. But that doesn't refute it. How about "People who defend ____ are morally bankrupt," and try substituting: Jeffrey Epstein, the Manson Family, etc. Now you might agree.
    1
  7. ​@cyberft  I'm trying to edit to get past the c__. No it isn't. It's not reasoning, so it doesn't have to "follow." You disagree with the value statement. That's fine. But that doesn't refute it. How about "People who defend ____ are morally bankrupt," and try substituting: the Manson Family, etc. Now you might agree.
    1
  8. @cyberft  I explained the logic very carefully, but guess who is opposed to logic? (Sometimes it appears if you sort by Newest and scroll, but who wants to do that?) Sometimes you get to see it posted on your feed, but no one else can. Fun with billionaires, lol.
    1