General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
L.W. Paradis
48 Hours
comments
Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "48 Hours" channel.
Previous
2
Next
...
All
The worst is that Chris had to admit guilt! Unbelievable!!
2
Like father, like daughter.
2
@Daniel_Capital I'm not justifying impossible court orders -- of course they do nothing but create incentives like this. But there are two other facts here: he spent a lot on relitigating the divorce and child support: did it occur to him to consult a bankruptcy attorney? Would that have stymied him in his career? Second, the youngest was 14. Four years was light at the end of a tunnel. Four years is a lot, but a lot can happen in four years, too. You don't deprive three girls of their mom over it.
2
@Daniel_Capital A purse snatching is like murdering the mother of your girls? No. It's nothing like that.
2
She's a snugglie. Isn't that like a furry?
2
A person genuinely in shock says strange things.
2
I believe everything.
2
The ducks are breathing a sigh of relief.
2
I didn't think of that, but absolutely, that is the right way to think, to protect innocent lives. Thanks for the reality check.
2
@Somegirl811 This is the television version. This isn't court.
2
@aroseprince If the call is a true emergency, it is NEVER a misdemeanor to call police.
2
Yes. It speaks to the fact that she comes from a traditional, collectivist south-east Asian culture and never assimilated. You'll note the judge made a point of stating in court that our society does not hold his parents responsible. It holds him responsible.
2
@Jackie-il4hv Were they indicted? Is there a police or FBI report saying so?
2
@Jackie-il4hv Anyone can withhold information: they must invoke their right to remain silent, and then remain silent. What they cannot do is lie. Or, we can give up the First Amendment for Johnny, and the Fifth Amendment for Gabby. That's a plan.
2
The DNA is too strange. If it belonged to ANYONE but an unknown assailant, it would not be significant. But it is there, and has appeared in other unsolved cases. The DA did the right thing to move for dismissal without prejudice.
2
@apoorvat4245 Yeah, too bad about Linda. Smh.
2
The real irony is that these two geniuses don't know that you have a right to remain silent, but that you do not have any right to lie to law enforcement, ever.
2
"just like him!!" 😂😂😂😂😂
2
@Rugelacharugula Not believing that stalking victims secretly enjoy being spied on and followed, never being at peace to live their lives, makes me terrible? Huh?
2
The diamond . . . ghoul.
1
Seven polygraphs??
1
Only a FOOL would do anything but divorce. Attacking someone guarantees they remain part of your future, one way or another.
1
It was a shocker.
1
This is who runs our lives. This is why things are the way they are.
1
I didn't.
1
Why do the step mom and daughter look alike?
1
💯
1
@colleenmahony8803 Look, absent mental illness that could amount to "diminished capacity" under the law, it does not matter. She is responsible for her actions.
1
I HOPE.
1
@wendyingram23 The DNA is in a crime database, linked to three other unsolved cases. They better find that guy, eh? He is a danger to us. Whether he's involved in this case is unknown. Whether her husband killed her is unknown.
1
@gregpettis1113 Feelings don't care about facts.
1
@butterflysflowers5119 You can read the statement by his attorneys and you can read about the judge in the case seeking to have the prosecutor disbarred. Her license is already suspended. You expect a video admitting previous videos were biased? Lol.
1
@lauraschroeder8177 Exactly
1
@barbaramoore4028 Because she relies on material evidence rather than bowing to your leadership in the social media sleuth brigade?
1
In the meantime, the DA who prosecuted him had her law license suspended for ethical violations, plural.
1
@N2Dressage001 You were there, you should have stepped in. 😂
1
@olaakinlade4362 Look, the male DNA found in her car that has also turned up at THREE other crime scenes needs to be explained. I'm not saying it can't be explained. I'm not saying it belongs to the perpetrator. I am saying it needs to be explained. That's what the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof mean. That's simply good police work. There is someone out there whose DNA has been found at a total of four crime scenes, this person has never been identified, and all the concern swirls around the husband? I want whoever that man is to be identified and arrested if the evidence is sufficient to make an arrest. He may be very dangerous. That should be the focus. That isn't psychobabble, that's real. :/
1
@N2Dressage001 Not what I read. (Did you know the prosecutor had her law license suspended? Did you do that "homework?") I didn't say the person whose DNA was found is the perpetrator. I said he needs to be identified and questioned. As many as three unsolved crimes hang in the balance, if not this one. I don't know what you mean by "match." There has been no identification, and hence, strictly speaking, no "match." I find it odd to go on and on about his daughters' psychology and be unconcerned about this physical evidence. I come from a state where an innocent man sat on death row while the actual murderer killed another victim, a young woman. It's not pretty. I don't know how her parents lived through it. I couldn't have, and I mean that literally.
1
@N2Dressage001 Have you read the statement by his attorneys in reference to the discovery of the remains? They were found during a search for another missing woman. In fact, there are several missing women law enforcement is trying to find, and all of them are likely to be dead. Have you read that the judge in this case is seeking to have the prosecutor disbarred? I don't understand why people get wound up about this man, and not the bigger picture: women are not safe.
1
@Egill2011 Simply ask whether you are under arrest. If so, they must provide Miranda warnings. Invoke your right to an attorney, and the questioning must stop.
1
Don't talk to police at all. Guilty pleas and admissions are for the judge.
1
@jodiegalloway3614 I do not believe this to be victim shaming. People are too trusting because they start with themselves. They assume others would not do what THEY would never do. (In other words, your own good character can get you in trouble, too.) They need to be altered to the fact that that is not true. Not even close.
1
@jodiegalloway3614 Sobriety is no guarantee of safety. Lack of sobriety inherently increases your risk. It's not fair. It is true. Lack of sobriety means you can't even jump into your own car and GO, on your own power.
1
The number of false confessions is so jarring to all of us that we can't accept it. I understand that. But we need to face it. We need to do something about it.
1
@jamesreed9013 I won't deny it, juries worry me. The appeal could only be based on ineffective assistance of counsel or something of that nature. You could also say insufficient evidence as a matter of law, but that's harder, actually. You have to prove that no fair-minded juror could convict on the evidence presented, not just that your trial was mishandled. The jury was instructed as to the law by the judge. Wasn't this guy listening? I just read the biography of a major attorney in my city who died recently at an old age. It bragged about how he won a case for a major hospital that had transplanted a kidney to a young woman and gave her HIV and hepatitis B. Both. There was no doubt as to the source. The excuse was that they followed standard of care at the time. The jury gave her nothing. I wouldn't want that biography, come to think of it.
1
@TheCarmelswan67 Okay, I'll look more closely.
1
@donnacabot3550 Sure they could. You need an outstanding civil rights lawyer.
1
Why does she look like the new wife??
1
🙏🙏🙏
1
@lazydaisy2292 You are wonderful. 🥀🥀🥀
1
Previous
2
Next
...
All