Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Explained: The Facial Scar Test (Social Experiment)" video.

  1. Where is it? Has it been replicated?
    1
  2. @robd3470  I found it later, but no longer remember the details. I know they ran the study four times (attempting to replicate their own work from the start -- how's that for excellent ethics?), and came up with this result only twice. Twice it didn't make a difference.
    1
  3. Replicate that study. In fact, first post the link. "Weaponized empathy?" Anyone who makes ANY claim of having been harmed is ridiculed and denounced in real life -- as a lot of vaccine injured found out. Your observations are about screen life.
    1
  4. ​ @stevechance150 That's no longer approved by the IRBs.
    1
  5. ​@vvwalker7261 I finally found the abstract, from 1980. They ran the study four times, and this positive result, that is, the one described here, was true in two of the four trials. Looks like (1) research standards were higher 45 years ago, as this team replicated their own research; and (2) we have a real crisis in standards today, as you can see by how Kisin reported the study. Athenians believed that truth was what pleased the most people in the agora, . . . until they lost a big war.
    1
  6. So . . . You don't need to read the study?
    1
  7. It's almost like studies that no one can find are nevertheless true if you want them to be true, academic malfeasance being rampant notwithstanding.
    1
  8. I finally found the abstract, from 1980. They ran the study four times, and this positive result - that is, the one described here - was true in only two of the four trials. Looks like (1) research standards were higher 45 years ago, as this team replicated their own research before publishing it; and (2) we have a real crisis in standards today, as you can see by how Kisin reported the study. Athenians believed that truth was what pleased the most people in the agora . . . until they lost a big war. No one was sorry for them in the entire Greek world, until one Spartan leader took pity. Victor's honor.
    1
  9.  @CleverGirlAAH  And Kisin himself gets ahead on the phenomenon. What would he talk about if he didn't have this to decry? He might have to WORK work. Glenn Greenwald just did a definitive takedown not long ago. It was funny.
    1
  10. "Weaponized empathy?" Anyone who makes ANY claim of having been harmed is ridiculed and denounced in real life -- as a lot of the vaccine injured found out fast. These observations are about screen life. They are true on MSM and the Internet. They don't exist in reality.
    1
  11. Replicate that study. In fact, first post the link. "Weaponized empathy?" Anyone who makes ANY claim of having been harmed is ridiculed and denounced in real life -- as a lot of vaccine injured found out. Your observations are about screen life.
    1
  12. 45 years old?? Ever replicated? 😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  13. ​ @MicahMicahel I finally found the abstract, from 1980. They ran the study four times, and this positive result -- that being, the one described here -- was true in two of the four trials. Looks like (1) research standards were higher 45 years ago, as this team replicated their own research; and (2) we have a real crisis in standards today, as you can see by how Kisin reported the study. Athenians believed that truth was what pleased the most people in the agora, . . . until they lost a big war. That sounds relevant all right.
    1
  14. The exact opposite happened to women who were laid off at an older age and then got discrete plastic surgery to look younger and got better jobs than the ones they had lost. Similar experiments were done with different hair colors and padding. I'll leave the details to your imagination.
    1
  15. ​ @SeanSandberg-j3q Was that a parody?
    1
  16. ​ @Nyet-Zdyes No link to the study, no information about it ever having been replicated. 😂
    1
  17. We had the Self-Esteem Movement already, remember? And the worst kids became dangerous.
    1