Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "CDC weighs in on rare heart inflammation following COVID-19 vaccine l GMA" video.
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hollenfeuer1 I already got this spam from you once, thanks.
FDA approval is a rigorous process involving advanced statistical analyses such as multivariate regression. We've only just learned of the remote myocarditis and endocarditis risk. Once the full analysis is completed, the risk could turn out to be smaller than we think, or, if not, we may find that there is an easy way to determine who might get it, and everyone else can rest assured that it won't happen to them as a result of the vaccine. What do you think full approval means?
News reports don't substitute for this analysis. Right now, people who know someone who apparently got severe side effects from the vaccine are reluctant to take it, when those side effects could be rare, or related to some other medical condition -- or, they may turn out not to be side effects at all, but coincidental. Or the result of catching a bad cold right after getting vaccinated (my European relatives were told to take extra care not to get sick for 72 hours post vaccine; no one here has been told that, that I know of).
In short, everyone I know reluctant to take this vaccine has experienced at least one life-altering medical mistake, has all their other vaccines, and wears a mask. IOW, I don't know the nut cases whose stories we've been regaled with. As for what millions of Americans have taken, that includes a whole lot of stuff that no one should.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1