Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "'No Empathy' Billionaire Sends Aggravating Email to 2.3M Federal Workers | Elon Musk Email Analysis" video.

 @privatecitizen62 Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard were just confirmed by the Senate. You think the President should ask for their resignations? Or should Musk? 😂😂😂
2
What makes you think federal employees don't have set, periodic goals and regular assessments? This is sheer clowning. Why do you think Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard told their departments not to respond?
2
@zachforbes3901 Well, all of Trump's nominees to head government agencies were just confirmed by the Senate. Might it be a good idea to consult them on how to proceed, even though they didn't contribute hundreds of millions to the campaign? Who imagines Musk is going to "save" America from "going under?" How can you not understand what's going on at all?
2
 @deniseamundson5617 Yeah, poor thing.
2
 @GuyFromTheSouth And you believe Musk? The Ketamine Kid. 😂😂😂
2
@RUAChristian OH WELL THEN If Ketamine Kid can dupe you this easily, then imagine how much fun AI will be!
2
 @annaf3915 Ha. Nobody would do that.
1
The President's nominees were all just confirmed by the Senate to head the various agencies and departments of the government. Perhaps it would make sense to seek out their views on how to improve efficiency and cut costs? Why do you think Patel and Gabbard immediately told their employees not to respond? Because they want to hide fraud? Or they're already attached to doling out their alloted budgets and aren't on board to make this administration succeed? Maybe you didn't think this through.
1
Oh. Is that why Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard immediately told their agencies not to respond?
1
@Sam-wd9ly Trump also had all of his nominees to head the key government departments and agencies confirmed by the Senate. I would think they might have some thoughts about how to conduct an evaluation of those working under them? Patel and Gabbard just told their people not to respond to Elon, and RFK Jr's face at the Cabinet meeting spoke volumes.
1
 @JDoe001 He's the face of ketamine abuse.
1
@Sam-wd9ly State Department also, and NASA did an about-face . . . Listen, if it is this easy to play on your resentment and get you on board for something this obviously idiotic, we have much bigger problems than a few goldbrickers in the federal workforce. Say, I have an idea. Read up on the privatization of Chicago's parking meters. Do that, and think about it for a while. See whether patterns could exist here.
1
Smart? The President's nominees were all just confirmed by the Senate to head the various agencies and departments of the federal government. Perhaps it would make sense to seek out their views on how to improve efficiency and cut costs? Why do you think Patel and Gabbard immediately told their employees not to respond? Because they want to hide fraud?
1
@hikingwiththedog6078 Didn't the President just have all of his nominees vetted and confirmed by the Senate? Perhaps he could see what they have in mind for their agencies?
1
 @Relevant_Saga0 Exactly.
1
She was fired? I bet she could write some mean bullet points.
1
 Steeled18 Are you kidding? This was brilliant. There are more conflicts of interest here than anything Hillary or Nancy touched . . . Well. Okay, . . . maybe not that many, but you get the idea.
1
@jimbaxter8488 Well, the Senate just confirmed all of the President's nominees. It might be collegial to ask them for proposals concerning how better to run their departments and agencies? Just a thought. Otherwise, what will their Five Accomplishments be? 😂
1
I would be glad to. When a de facto poly_gam_ist says jump, the only question is, how high?
1
No agency did start to investigate the problem. The President's nominees were all just confirmed by the Senate to head the various agencies and departments. Perhaps it would make sense to seek out their views on how to improve efficiency and cut costs? Why do you think Patel and Gabbard immediately told their employees not to respond? Because they want to hide fraud?
1