Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Sputnik V peer reviewed" video.

  1. Some people don't know the difference between suspending judgment (reasonable) and going on the attack (absurd at best). Or don't want to know.
    1
  2. Violate Occam's Razor more flagrantly, please. This isn't extravagant enough to get you the attention you need.
    1
  3. Well, we do need a test in a neutral country (Sweden, non-NATO, comes to mind), to see if results are replicated. If they are, I want the Sputnik V because I trust this approach. I also suspect it is better for the future -- we will need boosters, for mutations, just as we do for flu, and this is a proven approach. MRNA every year is too new to trust.
    1
  4. If there is further evidence that this vaccine is safe and effective, I want it. This seems to me to be the right approach. We cannot ignore the possibility of politicized information, on anyone's part.
    1
  5.  @user-fg8ux8zo6w  LOL
    1
  6.  @user-fg8ux8zo6w  Deserved, or nearly so.
    1