Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Lab leak conspiracy theory" video.

@veramae4098 It's more than a guess, but it is not definitive scientific knowledge, no. If scientific inquiry had not been suppressed, we might know by now. Alas . . . .
4
@MattHabermehl We don't have definitive answers, and it's obvious why. Inquiry was suppressed. You are correct that circumstantial evidence showing a greater likelihood than not that the virus originated in a lab is sufficient for a lawsuit!
3
The problem is that it is not conclusive, and we don't know the origins yet -- and the reason we don't is that scientific inquiry was deliberately and systematically stifled. This would tend to show that the virus originated in a laboratory in a court of law, but science is supposed to have a higher standard of evidence than the standard used in law, especially where human DISEASES are concerned.
1
@rinaf6550 There has been news, but you have to go searching for it. When Fauci said he could not exclude a lab accident, MSM did broadcast that. Likewise when some of his most suspicious emails came out. Weak sauce, true, but those who want to know did notice the shift.
1
How could any scientist label the hypothesis that the novel coronavirus originated in some sort of laboratory accident a "conspiracy theory?" The fact is, they did not know the origin. Why would they stifle legitimate debate? We might know for certain, now, had we had an open inquiry.
1