Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Chinese vaccine comparisons" video.

I've heard that NO mRNA vaccines are approved for use in China. I was interested in exactly this topic, and I thank Dr. Campbell for coming through for us again.
199
@christopherrobinson7541 Friday would be December 9: "Beijing will allow BioNTech's mRNA vaccine in mainland China but limit its use to German nationals, the Foreign Ministry said on Friday."
25
@christopherrobinson7541 What is your source for this, and when did they start? As recently as a month ago, no mRNA vaccines were approved for use in China. I will research this right now.
23
@christopherrobinson7541 I found the research, proved I was correct and that you were not. Now we can just wait for my posts to be shadowed, to make the picture complete.
23
@christopherrobinson7541 Sept 30 [2022] from Reuters: "Indonesia . . . has granted emergency use approval to an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine developed by a Chinese company, becoming the first country, ahead of even China, to do so." Emphasis supplied.
9
If this were such a serious illness, you would think that we'd be sharing all information as quickly as humanly possible. Instead, we've been watching suppression of information across the board, in every country.
8
@shotgunkawaii116 It has not yet been established that both types of vaccines have the same safety profile. It is simply not true that we know that "both have the same side effects." We are not clear yet on exactly how risky the mRNA vaccines are -- as the recent German study, which only came out in November 2022, can show you. Lots of people were vaccinated in the US long before anyone knew there was any myocarditis risk.
5
@milosstamenkovic465 Any percentage clearly under 1% for case-related mortality is outstanding. As another person pointed out, case-related mortality is always higher than infection-related mortality, because so many infected people are mildly ill or even asymptomatic, and never end up in the denominator.
3
@Denali1600 I will look it up. My simple point is, she told you where she got her numbers. I personally always look at deaths per million, although at this point we do not really know what they include. I will explain. It took a long time to establish that women who underwent multiple fertility hormone treatments without conceiving were at greater risk of ovarian cancer than those who did conceive. In relation to this issue, of deaths per million, I wonder whether those who had moderate to severe COVID, then were vaccinated with mRNA or other vaccines, in that order or in the reverse order for that matter, now have a higher risk of death. Multivariate analysis, which can give us the answer, is difficult, expensive and takes a long time. You get my drift.
3
@MsGarnet77 I could not agree more!!
2
Where were you able to get Sinovac?
2
@zwijn I love your pronouns.
2
@shotgunkawaii116 False. The relative risk profiles of the various vaccine types are not the same. This was made clear in 2021, when Johnson & Johnson was briefly suspended and the others were not. It was further made clear when we found out that age and sex had a bearing on risk for the mRNA vaccines -- the two mRNA vaccines not having the same risk profile, either. This is why a lot of European countries are not using Moderna before age 50, and not recommending vaccination before age 16 at all -- and not pushing it on people under 30, and not pushing boosters on those who have already had COVID and recovered. Why do you think we're all ignorant? Counting on something to have destroyed our memories?
2
@ruready2learn1 Well, the worst part is that if a person provides facts, they may be censored. A small misstatement or difference in emphasis could be considered misinformation. But if you just jeer at a person and say stuff like, "that's a LIE!!", because that can be construed as an opinion it will not be flagged or censored. That's how we get so much trash talk on media like this, and it starts to appear as though that's all that anyone ever does -- because the facts are long gone before anyone sees them. I know a LOT of people who try their best to state the facts and not descend into ad hominem will be censored the most. But anyway, you're kind. Thank you.
1
@MsGarnet77 Either my posts are shadowed or you haven't read them.
1
@MsGarnet77 That I don't know how to assess my sources. Laughable.
1
@firstname2072 "Due to the benefit of the mRNA vaccines?" Most of the world's population, even excluding China, as is necessary to make the point, has not partaken of the mRNA vaccines. No one continues to claim that they stop infection or contagion, and their ability to stop serious disease is limited. Why do you assume everyone is stupid?
1
@MsGarnet77 I read it, and I wasn't impressed that it was solid. To his credit, he gave a summary of all the reasons his numbers could not be compared to a carefully controlled study, a true audit of VAERS, and so forth. Saying that, I don't want to suggest that deaths due wholly or in part to the vaccine aren't happening, or that he didn't detect a signal that necessitates immediate attention. The people who should be racing to study this are failing us. At this point, they will need to do a multivariate analysis, because so many things have changed, or been imposed on us, all at once. This is not going to be easy, and the fact that they are not urgently looking into the question of vaccine safety is one of the most shocking and disillusioning things I have ever experienced.
1
A lot of what we were put through has been engendering suicidal thoughts in people who never had them before. I'm sure knowing that they took Pfizer or Moderna did not help their mental state, even if they had no serious physical side effects.
1
@selenacordeiro1458 Everything is SO politicized at the moment, so I had the good luck to find an article about vaccines long before COVID, and COVID propaganda, turned up. In February 2017, Yale has a fascinating article about flu vaccines and subsequent new diagnosis with mental disorders. Wow, just wow.
1
"[Yale professor of pathology, John] Rose, who developed a vaccine template that was used for the development of the current Ebola vaccine, said he trusts the current process of drug development to establish safety measures for vaccines. On average, a vaccine takes 15–20 years to be fully approved, Rose said." Huh. Whaddya know.
1
@Denali1600 She told you: she got the numbers from Worldometer.
1
@davidbarry6900 "Vanity project," LOL. Because they should have taken Pfizer and Moderna instead, hm? No mRNA vaccine has been approved in China. Considering their drive to attain (the unattainable) Zero COVID without destroying their economy (a significant incentive right there), you would think they would have adopted mRNA as quickly as possible.
1
@shotgunkawaii116 What lie did I tell? That different vaccines have different risk profiles? That is true. Look up any European ministry of health known for its excellent public health: Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden. See what they recommend. When you talk about several billion people, then 0.5% is important. One-half of one percent of one billion is 5 million. Stop your lying about mathematics. It's so awkward.
1
@shotgunkawaii116 You wrote: "By the way the current global mortality rate for covid 19 is 1% to 2% since day one regardless your are vaccinated or not." I supplied the emphasis. So, why get vaccinated?
1
@ewhite1546 J&J is not a live, attenuated virus at all, or an inactivated virus.
1
@shotgunkawaii116 In 2022, J&J is no longer recommended at all in my state, and this is where the governor got one of the first doses at the state fair grounds vaccination center (I commend him for that, actually -- lead by example and do what you ask other to do).
1
@shotgunkawaii116 I am, too, and I can reference ministries of health who have determined the differences to be significant. Every one of them has a web page in English. YOU ARE COUNTING on other people to be too lazy and ignorant to check for themselves. That is not wise, not on this channel. Blocked as another bad faith time-waster.
1
@davidbarry6900 That makes sense, because of the extreme refrigeration needed.
1
@goh123superman Interesting, given the costs of refrigeration.
1