Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "mRNA in blood after 28 days" video.

  1. It was an incidental finding, as they were looking for mRNA evidence of a different virus. They stated that this unexpected finding requires immediate study.
    4
  2. She was head of Illinois' public health department. She had to leave. At the beginning of the vaccination push, she was asked about the effects of the vaccines on fertility. She said, "We don't know. We don't know because clinical trials did not include pregnant women or women planning to become pregnant." She said it so calmly and matter-of-factly. I was stunned. I had to sit down. It was the first true thing I heard come out of anyone's mouth since all this began. (She even said "women." How quaint is that, lol?)
    2
  3.  @genius1a  Oops you beat me to it. Outstanding answer, thank you.
    1
  4.  @patrixjude1  Great point.
    1
  5.  @richvid9814  That is exactly why the conclusion was to do larger studies. Could the vaccine be riskier for people with certain liver problems? People with comorbidities were urged to get vaccinated and boosted. Please provide some keywords to identify the studies. We know links are generally shadowed, being too hard to monitor for TOS issues.
    1
  6.  @richvid9814  Okay, honey. I studied philosophy of science at the Paris IV, among other things, and I really don't have time for this unserious video. What does one case prove? One case, accurately reported, tells us what is POSSIBLE. It does not tell us what is usual. In biology, one single case is very unlikely to be limited to that one single person and true of no one else, but that, too, may be turn out to be true. That, too, is not impossible. The clinical studies for these vaccines were inadequate. THIS is why, or at least one major reason why, there are so many questions remaining, and there are so many confounding variables present at this point that it becomes very hard to figure out what is going on, what the real risks are, what the risk/benefit calculus should be, by demographic, etc., and various forms of multivariate analysis will have to be done. This will take time and money. We won't have anything very solid to rely on for a while. What I think people should do is consult the ministries of health of more civilized countries and see what they are recommending. It's all online. What was the point of your post, other than to flaunt your assumption that everyone besides you is stupid? Looks like you provided evidence for the opposite.
    1
  7. His point in this video is that in Denmark, we cannot ascribe the presence of mRNA in the blood after 28 days due to faulty injection technique, because they do not use faulty injection technique. Hence this finding is exceptionally important. It's an a fortiori argument; wherever they do not aspirate, the risk can only be higher, not lower. :/
    1
  8.  @evad7933  Granted, I don't know that, but it's quite possible. Did any adult in the US get injected in the buttocks? Or into a vein on top of their hand or their inner arm? All right, those are extreme deviations, whereas correct injection technique at the correct injection site is more subtle. So, you could be right. I did, however, characterize the argument properly.
    1
  9. The fact that this was a coincidental finding should sound alarm bells AND immediate study. These drugs need to be suspended until further studies are completed.
    1
  10. First of all, no one can confirm that means anything more than the traditional childhood vaccines in use for many generations. As for COVID, Brazil has accepted a lot of non-mRNA vaccines, such as those from China. I agree, though, no child should be obligated to take a vaccine against COVID.
    1
  11. What? Their statement reasonably calling for additional studies, given their surprise in finding these mRNA remnants in roughly 10% of the sample, OR their conclusory statement that the study should not be interpreted to contradict the mantra that "the vaccines are safe and effective?" You call that "cherry picking?" I say we do more studies, as Campbell just stated.
    1
  12. What "some are saying" is the direct result of what these irresponsible governments have done to us.
    1
  13. BTW, this was only if you tested positive and showed symptoms of COVID. But yes, she acknowledged a potential overcount.
    1