Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Megyn Kelly: Taylor Swift’s Extremist Transgender Ideology, Debate Reaction, u0026 Cable News Collapse" video.

Your channel is all horoscopes and tarot?
4
She lies all the time. 😂 I know because I'm a lawyer, so I know she doesn't believe what she claims. She's very smart and is making bank. Her kids will have nice trust funds.
4
She lied about the law. She is a lawyer, she knows.
3
@TheGAdamstalkshow Since you're in the business of independent media, I grant you that lying like Megyn will bring in more ad revenues, so I can forgive you for wanting your kids to have at least some of what hers do. So keep it up. Say rude things to the truthful, praise the dishonest. Cha-ching. 💰
3
@randyhanson4973 ??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
2
@ghhm2705 If that's true of your state, get that law rescinded. I summarized the Minnesota law. I hope they let you see it. :/
2
@kirst. You projected that I was projecting. I don't know why. Pop culture shouldn't be important.
2
@kirst. Not you. A kid who, from the ages of 12 to 15, is obsessed with attacking some moderately talented pop star as "evil." Moderately talented at best, but we can recognize that much. What were you doing from 12 to 15? (Right, me neither.)
2
@carltonlee5445 So, you think age of consent is a year sooner? No.
1
@Алексей545-т6б Not my point.
1
@user-fp3in2kf3b OP adds a year to people's ages to account for life in the womb. That means the 17 year old at Jeffrey's place is 18, the 17 year old who wants puberty blockers is 18, etc. Nah.
1
Don't worry. She lied about the law -- thank goodness.
1
@ghhm2705 I do know about the Minnesota law. These are cases where either there is extreme abuse, such as child abandonment, OR where parents divorce and are at odds about what to do about their child. It's almost always the latter. It's almost always a parent who demands this. I agree that in such cases, either parent should have veto power over puberty blockers, and other powerful drugs for that matter. It is true that the Minnesota law will support the parent "seeking treatment." That's no surprise. The laws usually have. I agree this is different.
1
 @davidbgooch9587 That was a perfectly reasonable comment. It takes nothing away from yours. No one can control replies to their comment.
1
Oh my god, Owens is crazy.
1
@davidbgooch9587 The first reply to your OP.
1
@loribreese-darling8636 Take a look and see what you think.
1
@loribreese-darling8636 Take a look and see what impression you get.
1
@Brandi0071 1. Make sure she's eating a pure diet. I suspect Kennedy is right about that. 2. Don't let her go down this road, no matter what. A goal is always to not have a prescription. All of these drugs are dangerous. 3. Pick your battles. Swift isn't important. In 5 years, there will be some other fad. (Swift will be 40.) On the other hand, no "gay-straight alliance" before age 18 and high school graduation.
1
@kirst. Jealous of a stranger. A blond stranger.
1
@kirst. Er . . . That would be YOU. 🤣🤣🤣
1
@TheColdrush22 🤣🤣🤣
1
@OwnYourLight For three years, at her age? Or, you fixated on it? Seriously, find better art. Or something. There has got to be some better use of a high school student's time.
1
@OwnYourLight 1. The fact that there is madness swirling around some pop star doesn't mean that pop star is "evil." Indifference to ridiculous fandom and imputing "evil" to its object are two different things. One of her concerts had to be canceled because of threats. 2. Since you have a presence online, you shouldn't talk about your child during a sensitive period of her development. She shared her views with you. Why should you share private mom-daughter conversations with us?
1
@t74guard78 Sharing private mom-daughter conversations with the Internet (for Likes?) is a sign of maturity and depth.
1
@t74guard78 I don't care about Swift at all. The person you're praising has a website concerned with astrology and tarot, with art that is evocative of witchcraft. It is almost 🤣🤣🤣 but not really.
1
@OwnYourLight You're the one who posted that your child (who never gave her permission to overshare, by the way) has been saying a pop star is "evil" for three years, no less, and that she "sees it." Even bullies leave a victim alone after a school year ends. Maybe your daughter didn't say this stuff for three years, either.
1
@loribreese-darling8636 My impression of the aesthetics presented, as I clearly stated: "art evocative of . . . ." I personally prefer to avoid that sort of thing, and I'm not conventionally religious at all. You make up stuff, then make up more stuff to paper over the first stuff.
1
@loribreese-darling8636 This started with a claim that some middle-brow pop star (who had a recent concert canceled due to serious threats) is "evil." Nothing less.
1
@OwnYourLight Sure we do. We took physics and math. And art history and graphic design, for that matter. You'd be surprised.
1
@loribreese-darling8636 Just watched the Newsweek interview of Routh, where he mostly talked about "evil." They interviewed Routh despite the fact that he had a serious weapons felony in 2002, shortly after 9/11. The New York Times did as well. Real good judgment everywhere.
1
@dvt1393 Who is mocking? What's sad is this nonsense. Some pop star is now the equivalent of Jeffrey Epstein (or Dahmer) because she meddled in politics where she has no expertise? We should encourage extremism in little girls, and brag about it on the Internet, rather than laughing it off and reassuring them that this is nonsense, there has been frenzy over pop stars before, and that this, too, shall pass? No wonder. Judgment is gone and isn't coming back. That should be your worry. I'm no longer surprised that it isn't.
1
@dvt1393 Who is mocking? What's sad is this nonsense. Some pop star is now Jeffrey Epstein (or Dahmer) because she meddled in politics where she has no expertise? We should encourage extremism in little girls, and brag about it on the Internet, rather than laughing it off and reassuring them that this is nonsense, there has been frenzy over pop stars before, and that this, too, shall pass? No wonder. Judgment is gone and isn't coming back. That should be your worry.
1
@dvt1393 The censorship of reasonable people and amplification of hysteria over nothing is much sadder.
1
@TheGAdamstalkshow I know she isn't just mistaken. I know she knows the law and is misrepresenting it for clicks.
1
@TheGAdamstalkshow She's misrepresenting the law in Minnesota -- THANK GOODNESS.
1
@清梦-m9v Not what I said. I said that because SHE is a lawyer, I know SHE both knows the law and is lying about the law. It is NOT possible that she is mistaken. No one in Minnesota will have a child removed from their custody absent proof of extreme neglect or abandonment. This is because it would be unconstitutional to do so. You have a right to parent your children. The other cases are where the parents are divorced and disagree. I think the parent opposing a physical transition should prevail, but the reason it is a question at all is because one parent WANTS transition.
1
@清梦-m9v I just told you the truth about the law, which Kelly misrepresents. Now let's see if YT lets it stay up. I'm not holding my breath.
1
@清梦-m9v Well?
1
Kelly lies about everything. She's always after other women, too. I can't stand "gender ideology," but the Minnesota law does NOT say what Kelly says it says. The real issue only comes up in cases of severe neglect, or in divorce, where the parents disagree about medical care. Kelly is a lawyer and knows this. She knows she's lying. By the way, I don't care for Swift. I have no need to go after her or smear her, however. Ignoring is good enough.
1
@user-Jo915 You think this is a problem? Ask your parents about when the Beatles took LSD, and went to India to follow some guru with Mia Farrow and her sister. That was a real problem. BTW, Kelly is lying about that law, thank goodness. She's a lawyer, she knows she's lying.
1
She's lying to you, she knows it, and she goes after other women like crazy. 😂 Megyn is a good lesson for your daughter: "Dear, see what women do to other women?"
1