Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Johnny Depp trial: Amber Heard suddenly demands case be dismissed | LiveNOW from FOX" video.

@retrogamermama7941 He's the plaintiff. And this isn't a criminal case.
14
No. It shows that this video thumbnail is abusing your intelligence with its ridiculous caption. A motion to dismiss is a normal procedural move at this time. It signals the end of the case in chief.
6
@hammerr3 Terrible People should have their house seized, and their bank accounts, and handed over to the TRUE victims!!! I'm on board. 🤣🤣🤣
6
@Cpt.CoffinNails The only people taking sides are the ones who are reliving their own relationships through projecting them on this spectacle of strangers' lives. This is a defamation case. He already lost a better one. Every defamation case chips away at free speech, and asks the court to set aside free speech. The norm is always the First Amendment, the burden is on a plaintiff to prove it does not apply here. He could have written an autobiography instead, an instant best seller. Instead he did this.
3
@baristaz8834 He was addicted. He might not remember. Or believe what he did drunk and high doesn't count anyway, because he never did it sober. Too bad he was rarely sober.
3
This is a normal procedural move at this time and may even be required, depending on Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure.
2
@sujanaryal833 Of COURSE there's proof. But are you so deep into your cult you won't acknowledge it? You'll smear whoever brings forward the proof? Why did he lose a lawsuit where he had a better case, and is redoing it anyway? Pure vindictiveness.
2
@agustinsp1 Okay, this is mass formation psychosis.
2
@kieranlee9610 In a court case, plaintiffs go first. They have to prove their case. That means all we have heard so far is his side.
2
@sujanaryal833 Well, the plaintiff just rested and the defense is presenting its case. The Sun case, which was a better defamation case, also had these core facts. Of course, an American jury might decide to hate on Heard. You can see that in action here.
2
This defamation case is not about whether Depp was also abused. It is about whether a specific article that that Heard signed and the Washington Post published is defamatory. If Depp also abused her, more than trivially, and more than in self-defense, then the article is NOT defamatory. That's the law. If he wants his story to be heard, he should write an autobiography and it would be the best seller of the decade. 🙄
1
A motion to dismiss is a normal procedural move at this time. It mirrors a motion for summary judgment, and may be necessary to preserve all issues for an eventual appeal.
1
@jebalitabb8228 It shows another moral panic.
1
@NorbiGaming He already lost one defamation suit, a much better one. He's doing this exactly to get this rise out of you.
1
The comments to this case show how many bad relationships are out there.
1
@rijudehingia1381 They have no children. Depp left the mother of his children, who are adults and live in Paris. This was Depp's third marriage/domestic relationship.
1
@baristaz8834 It's Putin's fault.
1
@baristaz8834 He was the enemy in the last cult. Now we have a new cult, with new enemies.
1
@baristaz8834 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@baristaz8834 blocked
1
@baristaz8834 Amber is as all-powerful as Putin. 🤣
1
@baristaz8834 Nowhere does the alleged defamation say he was the abuser. It's not an issue.
1
@lizwadsworth6918 No, no. All men are good. They may get physical if severely provoked, or if women force them into addiction. Now, women are the killers. Career killers, baby killers, killers simpliciter. We must take sides in a court case with complex interpersonal dynamics and First Amendment implications BEFORE we hear both sides, to demonstrate full loyalty. . . 1984 took a little longer, needed hashtags. /s
1
@JadeEyedJinx None of that counts in Hashtag World. We are in the midst of another cult phenomenon/moral panic. You cannot reason with these people. In fact, I'm surprised you haven't been censored.
1
@cjwhosthat9216 We should seize the assets of people who are ratioed by YT and hand them over to "Johnny."
1
@aaronpeaty6619 Is bringing a defamation case to court after losing a significantly stronger defamation case on the same factual predicates not wasting a court's time? Or only if girls do it?
1
@aaronpeaty6619 Hint: the boy brought these lawsuits, not the girl.
1
@aaronpeaty6619 Do you guys have trials or hashtags? Vote on Twitter? OOPS, I mean Facebook. Obviously.
1
@aaronpeaty6619 You accidently let Novak Djokovic go free, then. My GOD what a mistake. /s
1
@LAVAZZ. Um. I'm making fun. How big of a problem are drugs, anyway? The question just popped into my head for some reason.
1
@cjb34 Routine motion at the end of the case in chief. The defense always says that the evidence brought forward is insufficient as a matter of law to find liability.
1
Before you can get a court to set aside First Amendment freedom of speech, you have to prove it does not apply. Yup. Correct. Before a court orders the sheriff to seize your assets, like your bank accounts, your car, your house and place it on auction, a person has to prove you owe them $50,000,000. Well, in Canada, Trudeau did it to the truckers, and here Biden does it to Russians, but you get the general idea.
1
@claudeseymour Did you read that op-ed? He lost work after losing a much better defamation case in Britain. You think the mild article Heard wrote without naming names cost him $50,000,000? He cannot prove that.
1
@K.N.H. He cannot sue anyone to get even with the UK court. There is no law to let anyone do that.
1
@kcg8162 Because the Washington Post is incorporated in Virginia.
1
@schumiprofan Right. On the civil side, it's called liability, not guilt.
1
@zeenaabdura5686 She corroborated all of it with prior, contemporaneous consistent statements to multiple people, like relatives and therapists. That is not hearsay.
1
@payamal-abid2651 What do you think this mob is?
1
@jacobdestern4288 He lost work mostly because of his addiction and because he lost a prior defamation case and because he said lots of weird things like that "assassination joke," which you can find on YT right now.
1