Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Kim Iversen: Elon Musk BLASTS World Economic Forum's ESG Social Score. Bill Gates TOPS The List" video.

  1.  @talyahr3302  Exactly how the corporate world works. They can give us scores and decide not to hire us, or hire anyone without a score. They do exactly that with credit scores and lending, and auto insurance rates, too.
    8
  2. Kim was on Glenn Beck. Watch the segment, see what YT blacked out as being against community standards.
    8
  3. We've already had a hefty dose.
    5
  4.  @user-zf3mb2rh9n  Vaccine injury.
    4
  5.  @im2tweaked  LA Times reported it. It was a massive case. I still agree these scores are ridiculous.
    4
  6.  @d.r.4453  I agree. It's a valid question. Suddenly, real questions are "questions," wink wink (unfounded, innuendo, blah blah), when they deserve honest answers. Suddenly, valid questions Verboten.
    2
  7.  @Critical-Thinker895  Exactly. An eccentric will be right occasionally. It proves nothing. The US genuflects toward anyone who is "the richest man." Gates got this hagiography for years and years.
    2
  8. The company that made Polartec is the only ethical company I ever heard of. I'm sure everyone knows one, maybe two. Well, maybe not. 🤣
    1
  9. Tesla is named after a Serb.
    1
  10.  @d.r.4453  No one is jealous of Musk, any more than they were of Gates. But I agree about sourcing comments. Do you believe the highly visible head of a massive corporation has no influence over what happens in his factories? If people are in fear of complaining and putting an immediate stop to it, then there is something wrong with the structures in place. That kind of severe abuse is a low-level criminal offense in many countries. Here, people cower until they develop psychiatric conditions, then can't work, then have to sue. And it takes serious money to begin a lawsuit, because of the way the process is set up.
    1
  11.  @d.r.4453  Check the LA Times. He's right.
    1
  12.  @d.r.4453  Okay, no one healthy and sane is jealous.
    1
  13.  @d.r.4453  It's not just a matter of direct orders. Workplace discrimination is (1) extremely hard to prove; (2) more likely to get the victim black balled rather than compensated; and (3) has not required "direct orders" for about two generations, for obvious reasons. When it keeps happening, and C suite keeps insisting that it is not happening, then yes, the CEO is responsible. You mean Musk lacks the RESOURCES to uncover the truth and put an end to it? I mean, seriously? I guess he has to tweet, and pump up share prices instead. Who cares about the people actually making cars? Sheesh. (Bad performance for a South African, don't you think?)
    1