Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Kim Iversen: No FLUB— Biden AGAIN Calls For Putin REGIME CHANGE, Provokes Another FOREVER WAR?" video.

Oh no. What if our guys did the war crime?
19
@toffanful Also, the NYTimes assert the bodies were there for three weeks. What is the rate of decomposition at those temperatures? Was the area otherwise abandoned?
11
@smb123211 No. We are suspending judgment until we know the truth, as best as we can know it from our distant vantage point. But if you told your wife and she affirmed you, WELL THEN.
8
@Bronson37848 In any event, within the last hour, Reuters deemed the report of Russian responsibility for the killings as unconfirmed.
7
@Bronson37848 Exactly. We are being trained never to suspend judgment until we have the facts, as if suspending judgment makes you a genocide enabler. I would be afraid to stand in front of a jury today. Even ten years ago I would not have said that.
7
@smb123211 NYTimes claims the bodies were there for three weeks. This raises no questions in your mind? None at all? I mean real questions, that may have true answers consistent or inconsistent with that assertion.
7
The intro piece today is treating this report as confirmed.
6
@smb123211 Nope. Go review the Federal Rules of Evidence. Rule 404. (You REALLY don't get the difference between inculpatory and exculpatory evidence, BTW.) I suppose you've also failed to notice that if we accept your argument about character, it cuts both ways, not just to convict "the Russians."
6
@toffanful Sorry for omitting the /s.
4
@smb123211 WHO is JUSTIFYING a war crime?? Nice little sleight of hand. You're a natural skeptic if you say so.
4
@jameshurst6119 Impartial investigation. What OP called for.
4
@robertdownes793 Notice also the fundamental bad faith here: we "have to" "pick a side," RIGHT now. We cannot say the truth has not been established yet. That would be justifying a war crime(!)
2
@snuffeldjuret Just like Hunter's fake laptop.
2
Job requirement.
2
Exactly. No good guts in this picture!
1
@smb123211 Who are these people? What is the evidence? When did they make this determination? Why are multiple news outlets, including Reuters, which is mainstream, still reporting that the news is, as yet, unconfirmed? By the way, the Syrian gas attacks were the fault of Assad, vaccines will end the pandemic, and Russia gave us Trump. The laptop is fake. Numerous intelligence experts said the laptop had "all the earmarks" of Russian disinformation. Saddam had WMDs. Gaddafi will not be deposed.
1
@Bronson37848 Do you see how these people all do the same thing? Now suspending judgment = justifying war crimes. So dirty. Just a silencing tactic, designed to intimidate.
1
@alzer6467 Check again.
1
@cybervigilante I endorse your questions.
1
@alzer6467 Or are you pressing me to go full ad hominem? Is that it? Ad hom used to be recognized as dubious, now it's required?
1
Troyphy 🤣🤣🤣 The 🤡 deserved that!
1
@smb123211 Reuters again reported the Pentagon can neither confirm nor deny that Russian troops were responsible for the deaths.
1
@smb123211 NOTHING to do with narratives. It is either true, or it is false, that X murdered Y. Not "narratives," not who is a proven liar, not about "sides." How have we lost the desire for truth? I never thought I'd see it.
1
@smb123211 So, because the Steele dossier was fake, and Hunter's laptop real, should we believe everything Russia says? Automatically disbelieve everything our intelligence services state? Re-elect Trump?? This is crazy.
1
@smb123211 Tell me where you found this. (Not in the American press I hope.) Reuters is as mainstream British as you can get. TeleSUR and CGNT are reporting skepticism. I consider the Reuters report to mean that the perpetrator is still unknown. They have not updated that. China has called for an investigation. Good.
1
@smb123211 AP and ABC News: China calls for probe, assigns no blame.
1
@smb123211 India condemns the killings, calls for independent investigation.
1
@smb123211 Pakistan is in the middle of its own political crisis. Its parliament has been dissolved. Say. What are you trying to pull?
1
@smb123211 You're a great example of the mental illness that has overtaken this society. How did this happen?
1
@smb123211 Where did I say it wasn't true? I said it needed to be independently verified. So I'm for India and China. I'm on their side.
1
@smb123211 WHO supports Putin?? Look, I consider Trump an abomination, and his election a watershed event from which we have not recovered, BUT the Steele dossier was nevertheless fake. The laptop is real. It's called empiricism. Try it, put your toe in the water.
1
@smb123211 Both India and China called for independent investigation. I support them. Your claim that they condemned Russia was false, BTW.
1
@smb123211 I offered my home to Ukrainian refugees back in February, should the need arise. You? What have you done, except cheer for more more more war? Pfft. Like I said, try empiricism. It's not virtual, it's real.
1
Try weally weally hard to get her cancelled.
1
@snuffeldjuret Well then, what are you waiting for? Up your game.
1
@snuffeldjuret But you just had to dip your toe in the water. 🤣 Listen, we all do it occasionally. But not for, say, cancel culture, yeesh.
1
@PlayShorts3 You got it. 🤣
1
@snuffeldjuret I understand innuendo, insinuation, and other such rhetorical moves. I bet you do, too.
1
@snuffeldjuret You have a point there.
1