Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Kim Iversen: Latest Pfizer VAX DATA DUMP Shows Natural Immunity WORKS. ADE, Fertility Unknown" video.

  1. We are lucky they still DO document drug trials this carefully. Next time, they won't. Just like they changed the laws for . . . Wall Street and Silicon Valley.
    362
  2. My cousin in Montenegro got Pfizer. She got a blood count prior to her first dose. Then a doctor spoke to her prior to her second, asking her about side effects from the first dose, and took a second blood count before giving her the second dose. She was warned that for about a week after the shots, she should be more careful, because she was more likely to get sick. Montenegro. Not a developed country. (Hi YouTube censor! How's your day going?) P. S. She's 72.
    128
  3. Anyone starting lawsuits? Sounds like only that might free you.
    13
  4. WHY did everyone just believe it? WHY?
    12
  5. And they've known that for a long time.
    9
  6.  @naijaplayer  Conjecture.
    8
  7.  @sueblood7793  Try again. Read slowly.
    4
  8. You didn't notice the AGE gradient? "But what about the children?" Isn't that the go-to? Why not for this? When they're selling us a war, it's About the Children. This drug was mandated. Just like we get no say in war, or Wall Street.
    4
  9.  peter crane  Not at all. Antibody dependent enhancement. With second boosters being approved, a real risk. And for people who have 50+ years of living ahead of them, who knows? Listen to the vid again, yo.
    3
  10.  @jimnicholasville8326  You're right. It has already started. I'm the boiling frog and think I'm fine.
    2
  11. No evidence of that, either.
    2
  12. The mRNA dose for Moderna is higher, hence the presumption would be that it's the same or worse. But strictly speaking, we don't know.
    2
  13.  @helencheung2537  Yes. Scary!! I hadn't realized that.
    2
  14.  @Malcolm5252  You have very little evidence for that, either. A few places on the planet had hospitals and morgues overwhelmed. Literally just a handful. The US pre-vaccine and post-vaccine statistics are not compelling. It is clear that people over 50 were FAR less likely to suffer serious illness with the vaccines, and that the cost-benefit analysis for them weighed heavily in favor of taking the risk of vaccination. That much is true. That much, but not more.
    1
  15.  @freeweights101  That's right. The consent forms painted a very different picture than the MSM, but "brought to you by Pfizer." They counted on people not reading them. The media had me believing no one was going into debt for medical care surrounding COVID or vaccine injuries. HA.
    1
  16. Precisely. Thanks for helping us exhale!
    1
  17. Okay. Deep breath. This is why people think it's no problem to lie to you.
    1
  18. I haven't yet, but he's a zealous tort lawyer. In general, that means that if you check his footnotes, they are likely to be solid, the type of stuff you can use in court. His commentary is likely to be heavy advocacy (also called bias, also called spin). So it's probably a good book overall.
    1
  19. There was no vaccine in 2020. People who contracted COVID had no reason to get this new vaccine, and no information whether the vaccine would not only be superfluous for them, but possibly riskier. NO information. Sounds like a mandate scenario to you?
    1