Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Mark Cuban OBLITERATED on DEI Hiring By Federal Commissioner, Gets Told IT'S ILLEGAL: Robby Soave" video.

  1. No she didn't.
    3
  2. @RavenheartIndustries  No, she pointed to the well-known résumé study, which has been replicated many times, as evidence of discrimination and then asked for alternatives to DEI. Not kinda-sorta. Exactly that.
    3
  3. So do legacy admissions and legacy hires.
    3
  4.  @Rodrifuuu  Excellent idea
    3
  5. The bias against Brie, and all the putting words in her mouth she did not say, tends to reinforce her point. Too bad. It would be better if that were not the case.
    2
  6. @JohnM-sw4sc  But that is who gets in. The vast majority of qualified applicants do not, regardless of anything else. They could have an Olympic medal and perfect grades. A legacy will get in first.
    2
  7.  @SunTingWong  With comments like that, you prove her point. Do you actually believe you're smarter than her? (Do you think you speak better than Naledi Pandor?)
    2
  8. @TruthShallSetYouFree74  Brie is smarter than anyone trashing her here, and they are intimidated by that. And they think that if she says something they don't like, that makes her "dumb." I disagree with her on COVID, and 90% of the time on trans issues. I also think her communication skills need some improvement. That doesn't mean I don't recognize her intellect, which is top-notch. Brie is brilliant.
    2
  9.  @JohnM-sw4sc  I wonder if you will be allowed to see my reply. The algorithm does not like references.
    2
  10. @marinaton  I agree with that. Brie asked for suggestions to solve the problem that would be legal. Affirmative Action originally meant information-sharing and recruiting. Just like everyone knows that legacy applicants to Harvard are privileged, everyone also knows the boss's nephew will get the job. The idea was to eradicate the effects of that discrimination through intensive mentoring. But . . . That's hard. Corporations want a plug and push algorithm, cheap. 😂
    2
  11. Affirmative Action originally meant information-sharing and recruiting. Just like everyone knows that legacy applicants to Harvard are privileged, everyone also knows the boss's nephew will get the job. The idea was to eradicate the effects of that discrimination through intensive mentoring. But . . . That's hard. Corporations want a plug and push algorithm, cheap. 😂
    2
  12.  @jackcslewis2009  It's hard for them, apparently.
    1
  13. @lanceolot007  Controlled? Brie did not vote for Biden OR for Hillary Clinton, and makes sure everyone knows it.
    1
  14.  @lanceolot007  You two want to be seriously triggered? Go watch Prime Newtons. Or listen to Naledi Pandor's comments to the press after the ICJ verdict.
    1
  15. @lanceolot007  The number of Likes determines truth? That's so wh ite.
    1
  16.  @lanceolot007  Yawn
    1
  17.  @lanceolot007  Oh, you're upset all right. Twice you tell me you're not. 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  18. @whisper2284  Of course. People who have never seen all the math channels on YT hosted by people from Africa, people who have never watched Naledi Pandor speak without notes, people who aren't following the BRICS+ summit, people who have never seen a picture of a major Latin American bookstore, and people who have never been outside the country in any global capital. They will all say "IQ!!! IQ!!!" like clapping seals. At least the seals get a fish.
    1
  19.  @lanceolot007  You still don't grasp irony. Like, did you ever read literature? L i t e r a t u r e
    1
  20.  @lanceolot007  The world has moved on without you.
    1
  21. @lanceolot007  Nah, there are millions like you, concentrated in North America. Nothing new to me. Look who your leaders are. You should care about standards, . . . though it may be too late.
    1
  22. You should read the résumé studies and Michelle Alexander.
    1
  23.  @JKH-uu9uq  Those were?
    1
  24. If you know about them, it does.
    1
  25. The resume studies are well known and have been replicated. U of Chicago participated in one, and they are nobody's fools.
    1
  26. Why don't you know about them? I do. A recent one even detected bias against Russian names.
    1
  27. Nope. She asked for alternatives. I heard it. Where were you?
    1
  28. U of Chicago was involved in one, and they have been replicated many times. A recent one detected bias against Russian names as well.
    1
  29. ​@NoalFarstrider U of Chicago is nobody's fool. Marquette replicated it, for one. Many have.
    1
  30. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  31. She asked the guest for suggestions.
    1
  32.  @ryananthony3104  No. Suggestions to resolve the issue.
    1
  33. You never read the studies. They DID send identical résumés out with names and zip codes changed. U of Chicago was one of the research institutions that did this, and they are nobody's fools.
    1
  34. Was Naledi Pandor a diversity hire, too? How about Biden and Trump? Neither one can talk too good. Add Pelosi, Harris, etc., etc., etc.
    1
  35. He didn't answer at all. He evaded the question.
    1
  36. ​ @tangreen7267 I feel sorry for you. You are sure you can read minds.
    1
  37.  @찬칯  Better yet, sleep with them.
    1
  38.  @lyno2834  Most of the time, exactly that. And it is always discounted anyway.
    1
  39. Didn't a bunch of billionaires just say they were setting aside jobs for Jewish kids? I mean, even if that often correlates with merit, isn't it illegal?
    1
  40. ​@ericheick7044 The résumé studies demonstrated it, and were replicated. U of Chicago was involved in one, and they are nobody's fools.
    1
  41.  @johngresham-im6xl  Totally false, lol. The flak is directed at everyone with the wrong opinion on Palestine now. So, two can play your game: you are savaging her on account of Likud.
    1
  42. Her second question was to ask what this expert suggests as a solution.
    1
  43. You can't wave away the résumé studies so easily. One came from the U of Chicago. They were replicated many times. One even turned up anti-Russian discrimination. So, what's your solution?
    1
  44. The résumé studies were replicated many times. U of Chicago did one, and they are nobody's fools. Another major study found bias against both black-sounding and Russian-sounding names. Accept the reality.
    1
  45. No. She asked for suggestions on how to defeat bias.
    1
  46. The résumé studies were replicated many times, in this century. One turned up discrimination against Russian names, too.
    1
  47. Like Hollywood does? Probably a good idea. But the résumé studies also saw discrimination based on zip code. BTW, I have a post office box in a rich suburb. I'm not dumb.
    1
  48. You can't make the résumé studies go away with your comment. 😂
    1
  49. ​ @wekurtz72 And how did Naledi Pandor get her job? Hmm?
    1
  50. @JohnM-sw4sc  There are vastly more. This was revealed after Harvard lost its case against the Asian students. Over 40% of white admits are there for some reason other than academic excellence. Ted Kaczynski was the classic outsider admit on pure merit, from a modest home, and they experimented on him. The Atlantic article about it is still up. I just found it.
    1
  51. @lanceolot007  Oh yeah? She is getting in a lot of trouble for her stance on Palestine, and for being vocal about the fact that she didn't vote for Joe or Hillary.
    1
  52.  @JohnM-sw4sc  Well, sense or ship, yet again.
    1
  53.  @lanceolot007  Rants never sense oared. Facts, ALWAYS.
    1
  54.  @JohnM-sw4sc  I guess not allowed to give soc class-based facts about Ivy admissions, much less mention what happened to una bummer at H. Or tell you where to read about it. Decipherable?
    1
  55. You can't wave away the résumé study. U of Chicago conducted one of those. They were replicated many times. One study even showed that having a Russian sounding name leads to discrimination.
    1
  56. I like this idea, actually.
    1
  57. Wrong. The study has been replicated many times. Zip codes were chosen to reinforce racial identity. U of Chicago was involved in one study, and they are TRULY nobody's fools. Marquette also discovered anti-Russian bias when they replicated it. Don't tell me that's dubious.
    1
  58. What's the difference? They are comparing black college graduates to white high school graduates.
    1
  59. You can't make the résumé study go away that easily.
    1
  60. ​@tangreen7267 How many people not of your race go to your family's weddings and funerals? In life, I've found that tells you the most.
    1
  61. Didn't a bunch of billionaires just say they were setting aside jobs for Jewish kids? I mean, even if that often correlates with merit? Isn't it illegal?
    1
  62. Affirmative Action originally meant information-sharing and recruiting. Just like everyone knows that legacy applicants to Harvard are privileged, everyone also knows the boss's nephew will get the job. The idea was to eradicate the effects of that discrimination through intensive mentoring. But . . . That's hard. Corporations want a plug and push algorithm, cheap. 😂
    1
  63. Sorry you can't face the reality of the résumé studies. They were replicated many times. A recent one found bias against Russian-sounding names, too.
    1
  64. She asked what this guy's suggestion was. Missed that, too?
    1
  65.  @ryanconard87  Ooooh, I'm supposed to read the COMMENTS and get in line! Silly me.
    1
  66. @ryanconard87  I've been struck by how often the comments claim Brie said exactly the opposite of what she said. It's uncanny. You do see that, but nowhere near as often with other newscasters. Sometimes the timestamp shows she said the opposite of what she said, and the person posting added it themselves. Say, if you really want to get triggered, watch PrimeNewtons. 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  67.  @ryanconard87  Of course. DEI in action. 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  68. @ryanconard87  Now try Naledi Pandor's comments to the press, after the ICJ verdict. She is 70 years old, completed her doctorate in 2019, and speaks without notes. SA television has them, as do other channels.
    1
  69. @ryanconard87  The opening remarks of the BRICS+ summit might also be helpful here. You hear Biden or Trump (or Harris or Pelosi or McConnell, etc., etc.) sound like any of them? No, huh? 😂
    1
  70.  @ryanconard87  That's possible.
    1
  71. Good people, or the right people? Better bet on the latter.
    1