Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "E. Jean Carroll JOKES She'll Buy Rachel Maddow A PENTHOUSE With $83M Trump Payout: Rising" video.

  1. This $83 million judgment was the New York Times headline the day the ICJ verdict was handed down, and a few days before the BRICS+ began their summit.
    14
  2. If that is the case, the appellate court will overturn it. Be sure of it.
    7
  3. @lanceolot007  Comments are deleted FAR too often generally. Where Brie is concerned, unfair negative ones get amplified a lot.
    4
  4.  @johnconnors6412  Appellate courts are different. They set legal precedent. Technically speaking, trial courts do not.
    4
  5. ​@TrentSLucas Brie qualified it each time by saying it was E Jean Carroll who makes the claim. She never said it took place. This is true. Carroll did and does make this claim. Listen again.
    4
  6. ​ @evan258  This is disingenuous. If you want to know what a judgment is actually based on, you have to read the court documents. I haven't, so I don't know. Have you?
    3
  7. I agree with this.
    3
  8.  @BigOleSwingers  That, if true, depends on the precise wording of the law in that state. In a few places, that does qualify as, you know.
    1
  9. @bobrown582  Sure she did: "from her perspective, . . . " etc. That's enough for a newscaster to cover themselves, even without relying on The New York Times v. Sullivan case.
    1
  10. @hillaryclintondidnothingwrong  It's in this video. From E. Jean Carroll's perspective, she was _____. You know, gaslighting when there is no record is one thing, but claiming that what is right here isn't, in fact, here is scary.
    1
  11.  @hillaryclintondidnothingwrong  3:55 Just click. It will take about 15 seconds, tops.
    1