Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Krystal and Saagar: CNN's Sanjay Gupta DEFENDS lab-leak hypothesis" video.

@aman-qj5sx It's not idiotic to question whether there was an intentional leak. It's idiotic to think so without evidence.
2
@benc2972 The point is, you have to prove intent. Also, an intentional leak would require quite compelling evidence, because the hypothesis is, after all, rather extreme.
2
@typearce1823 Where did I say to take anyone's word, especially anyone from the political class, of any country? I never did, because I never do. Intentional vs. accidental or negligent release requires meeting a greater burden of proof. That's just a general rule. Not specially made for the current fiasco, which I agree seems to have been very convenient for certain people.
2
3:09 Perfect, Krystal. That's how everything from ordinary biased reporting to intelligence agency psy-ops work.
1
@ReactionShot Links are hard to monitor for TOS. They all get taken down.
1
@kerwinbrown4180 A virus that kills only the oldest people in large numbers, and hardly affects people ages 15 to 30, is not likely to be part of a eugenics plot, or experiment.
1
@kerwinbrown4180 Eugenics seeks to prevent those who are considered "unfit" from reproducing. The elderly are done reproducing. You are describing Social Darwinism and beliefs sometimes adopted by various fascist movements, not eugenics.
1
@kerwinbrown4180 But yeah, eugenicists hate the "weak," too.
1