Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Kim Iversen: Pfizer Vax Docs Released By COURT ORDER, Data Will Tell The STORY About Side Effects" video.

Bravo, you are a hero. People are being shoved out of jobs for one reason or another everywhere, especially if they have seniority, because they are better paid.
33
@stoneyrules No reasonable, rational person said the vaccinated would be dropping dead. (Maybe that was a false flag? See BBC documentarian Adam Curtis on that issue, fascinating stuff.) The point is, the burden of proof for ANY medical procedure is on the proponent of the procedure, who must demonstrate safety and efficacy, and the burden of proof for MANDATES is correspondingly greater, to show necessity to protect the public, not just the individual. When was that burden met?
26
@stoneyrules Wrong. I speak French. Montagnier was mistranslated. It had to be deliberate, it was that far off. OH WELL.
8
So, who studied these hundreds of thousands of pages in the first place? Nobody did? That could be a good guess. I'd like to see the evidence that the documents were scrutinized to the same degree as all other vaccine data have been in the past.
8
@stoneyrules There was no such goal, and we know that because (1) patents were never lifted, and there was no appreciable effort to vaccinate in the poor countries; and (2) animal reservoirs have been identified, making eradication next to impossible. Both points also mean new variants are highly likely to arise, though they may not be worse ones. We also know none of the vaccines promised sterilizing immunity, only high resistance to infection and prevention of serious illness. This was an accomplishment already, considering the valid ADE concerns at the very start.
6
@stoneyrules Do you know how many people over the age of 12 live in Africa?
6
@stoneyrules As of February 2022, the UN reports 11% of Africa has been vaccinated. Many African countries report 1 to 2% vaccination. In 2022. Africa has close to a billion people, which includes infants and children too young for vaccines. Some countries show high rates of antibodies, meaning the population has acquired a high level of natural immunity, at least for now.
6
@stoneyrules If Africans are doing better than we are, we should ask why. Conjectures: younger population, fitter population, more traditional plant-based diet with meat for feasts only, more time outdoors in sunshine, walk more steps per day, more respect for elders, etc. All of that is good for you, but we don't know what it means for COVID resistance yet.
6
The consent forms stated that by signing, you acknowledged that you read the vaccine fact sheet, AND that after reading the fact sheet, declining vaccination would have no effect on your future medical care. Those forms were pretty interesting. Too bad nobody reads this stuff.
6
@stoneyrules Give it up.
5
@scottwhittaker1681 Amen!
5
@stoneyrules The vaccines were made with NIH (public) funds.
4
@joankearney4029 The media lied. The consent forms never promised the vaccines would prevent all COVID infections. Funny how that is. :/
4
@Aj-uu5is Threat of being fired is a big deal. I consider that coercive.
3
@stoneyrules Hint: don't "quote" eminent French intellectuals to someone with/using a French name. 🤣🤣🤣 Zap!⚡
3
@stoneyrules The consent forms and the official vaccine fact sheets they distributed with the consent forms never overpromised. Rachel Maddow and others like her in the media did. They were the ones who flat-out made stuff up. I don't put that on Pfizer, etc.
3
One death per 100,000 vaccine doses that are determined to be due to the vaccine should alert scientists, and require explanation. How does anyone expect to advance the development of better vaccines without examining the data? What is so different now that the issue is suppressed?
3
Neither do I.
2
Why would the number of all doses of vaccine distributed be redacted from this document?
2
@ariellemainez7752 My closest relative is a cousin, living in a less developed country. She is in her early 70s. Before her first dose of Pfizer vaccine, she got a blood count. Before her second dose, she got a blood count again, and was interviewed by a doctor concerning her side effects from the first dose. The doctor then approved the second dose. Just let that sink in. :/
2
@ariellemainez7752 Also, my cousin was told by her doctor that within 7 to 10 days of a dose, she could be more vulnerable to COVID, and to be extra careful. At the end of that period following her second dose, she would be fully vaccinated. Head shaker, huh?
2
@lamesamelame Exactly!
2
@lamesamelame If no other country except the US approved these vaccines, I would not consider taking them. Tragic to be at that point. The FDA was the best in the world, once upon a time.
2
@enshrinehd I agree, which is why I say check all of his footnotes. But don't think he isn't biased. He sure is. If you had a suit against a pharmaceutical company, or a toxic tort case, you would want zealous representation. He would be like having a pit bull on your side.
2
The New York Times has an article on who survives COVID despite risk factors and the laboratory that studies these people. One person they are studying recovered from a relatively mild case. I believe she is 112? I'd have to double check. Over 110 for sure. :)
2
One study showed that 11% of those who believed they escaped the very first wave were in fact infected. Another study showed that of proven cases, the antibody tests administered early during the pandemic were failing to detect antibodies in 30% of those with mild cases, 90 days after full recovery. So, we need a LOT more information.
1
@susanrollis2411 Thank YOU! :)
1
@81banga 12,000 years ago is 500 generations, first of all. Second, modern archeology has found evidence that East Africa (a likely cradle of mankind) became agricultural long before that, but that agriculture was relatively primitive and never took hold or spread. A plant-based diet is traditional, and meat is for feasts. Show me a major religion that says you can eat any meat, any time, in any quantity, and in any combination with other foods. There isn't one.
1
Who examined all of these documents in the first place? Within weeks? No one, obviously.
1
@lamesamelame If (big if) it is true that the Chinese economy is growing faster than any Western economy, expect more slavish imitation. :/
1
@lesaamoore If that were the motive, no one would have supported patent protection for the vaccines a full year out. Skepticism concerning the real danger is not unwarranted.
1
@enshrinehd Yes, if you make sure to check RFK Jr's footnotes. He is a **very** aggressive torts lawyer, and has had substantive success, not just thanks to the family name. But that means he's very biased. Worth a read if you know what you're reading.
1
@enshrinehd He has litigated, yes. I don't know whether he does now, or would if a case similar to cases he has won in the past were to cross his path. Sure everyone is biased, but this is different. Plaintiffs' side tort lawyers are a breed apart. I don't mean it as criticism. They are good at what they do. I'm just saying check his receipts.
1
@enshrinehd Agreed.
1
@enshrinehd One death per 100,000 vaccine doses that is in fact due to the vaccine should alert scientists and require explanation. This is nothing new. What is so different now that the issue has been suppressed?
1
Who examined all of these documents in the first place? Within weeks? No one, obviously.
1
One death per 100,000 vaccine doses that are determined to be due to the vaccine should alert scientists, and require explanation. How does anyone expect to advance the development of better vaccines without examining the data? What is so different now that the issue is suppressed?
1
@adrianelittle3759 Incredible. Thanks!! Were they vaccinated, or were they infected by an earlier, more lethal strain? EDIT: You just told me alpha. I may have brain fog!
1