Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "CCP Slams LAB LEAK Report; White House STILL Won't Embrace DOE Findings As MSM Offers CORRECTIONS" video.

@garrettolson5516 Off-label compassionate use of medications, particularly in an emergency, is a very well-established practice, and is often the ethical thing to do. Or at least, it was. Ending that is not a good thing. Rethinking it, fine -- but then allow all of the doctors who were featured yesterday testifying before Congress to weigh in. They should be heard from first, because they were right.
3
@EbluestarE When she is good, she's magnificent. She seems to be a lot better on her own show, actually. Hmm . . . supports the OP to some degree.
1
@garrettolson5516 That's fine. I've downloaded the first and plan to read them all. Notice that several of them date from just the other day. MY point still stands, but you call me the idiot. Are you a false flag? You act like one because . . . ?
1
@garrettolson5516 The second one is an JAMA editors' note, by the way, not a study. Did you look at it, genius?
1
@garrettolson5516 "Off-label compassionate use of medications, particularly in an emergency, is a very well-established practice, and is often the ethical thing to do. Or at least, it was. Ending that is not a good thing. Rethinking it, fine -- but then allow all of the doctors who were featured yesterday testifying before Congress to weigh in. They should be heard from first, because they were right." They WERE right about the origins of the pandemic, the prudence of forcing vaccinations, particularly on the young, the effectiveness of the vaccines to stop transmission, the harms associated with locking down the world, the CENSORSHIP, and the need to study other approaches, which these studies prove was necessary, because you had no idea ab initio what would work and what would harm more than it helped. Rethinking it, fine. Name calling is not thinking.
1
@garrettolson5516 The first "study" is a press release about a study that used ivermectin for three days.
1
@EbluestarE Original post (that starts the thread)
1
Except that we don't. What if their next concoction is a version of Ebola? I don't have any confidence in the judgment of "authorities" at all at this point.
1
The vaccine, such as it is, was developed during the prior administration. But it was THIS administration that supported mandates.
1
Ha. The CCP discussion on how to approach this took place behind closed, soundproof doors. You can bet some CCP were and are blaming it on the capitalists who were allowed to bribe their Virtuous Scientists.
1