Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Rachel Bovard: Fauci GASLIGHTS On Gain Of Function Research In SHOWDOWN With Rand Paul" video.

  1.  @bigraviolees  1:50
    2
  2. DARVO
    1
  3. So you missed The Intercept's article concerning the documents released in their FOIA request.
    1
  4.  @PikachooUpYou  Or as a foil.
    1
  5. It's called explanation. Bovard mentioned it.
    1
  6. The paper that Rand has IS from the Wuhan Institute, and has an NIH grant number. That's not a definitional issue, but evidence of funding.
    1
  7.  @etchalaco9971  Wonderful. Cite them.
    1
  8.  @etchalaco9971  You understand the difference between evidence that Study X was indeed funded by US tax revenues, and expert opinions concerning the nature and proper regulatory characterization of Study X. Right?
    1
  9.  @etchalaco9971  "Peer reviewed means . . . " oh please, as if we don't know
    1
  10.  @etchalaco9971  I'm not shifting the burden. I'm asking for citations to the papers Fauci chose to present. I'm not saying he was legally bound to present them; I don't know that. Congressional hearings are open to public inspection, hence anything introduced is open to public inspection. You are the one asserting the papers Fauci chose to present do, in fact, say thus and so. Hence you need to provide the citations to the papers, which (of course) say what you assert they say. That should be a breeze.
    1
  11.  @etchalaco9971  Nowhere have I said papers Fauci chose to present fail to say what you say they say, or fail to prove his point. I just said Show Me.
    1
  12.  @etchalaco9971  Cite them. Or, haven't you seen them?
    1
  13.  @etchalaco9971  You think this is a game? Your posts all sound like you think so. (Got a bet riding on it? Just kidding.)
    1
  14.  @etchalaco9971  NO, friend. A public servant testifying before Congress is expected to be forthcoming to any and every Member of Congress, who was elected to represent the people. It was Trump (along with people like Rush Limbaugh, Antonin Scalia, and many others) who made obnoxiousness not only acceptable, but an impressive power move. Fauci and Trump's good cop bad cop act was theatre. Nice you fell for it. And you obviously have no clue what peer-reviewed papers Fauci cited in this testimony. Great. I'm done here.
    1
  15.  @etchalaco9971  No problem. You don't understand the nature of congessional hearings. This is not an adversarial proceeding at all. I don't care. It makes no diff to me, planning to be out by 2025.
    1
  16.  @etchalaco9971  You didn't understand what I said. Are you bilingual? Cuz I am. But mostly lived in the US.
    1
  17. DARVO (Deny, Accuse, Reverse Victim, Offender)
    1