Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "HERO or MURDERER? Daniel Penny FOUGHT and KILLED Jordan Neely: Rising DEBATES" video.

  1. @jeanwesleynew  She claims a trainer in the Marines made that assertion. Without a clip, I can't blame you for not believing her. Still, it makes sense to reserve judgment.
    6
  2. What did Neely do exactly? Was it illegal? "Erratic" is just the subway. Making people fear for their lives or property is generally illegal. Priors are irrelevant in this situation. Someone with no priors could threaten a person. It's wrong the first time. A person with many priors might just have been goofing off and not scaring anyone this time. Thank goodness Penny will have defense witnesses. The court will decide.
    5
  3. What did Neely do exactly? Was it illegal? "Erratic" is just the subway. Making people fear for their lives or property is generally illegal.
    3
  4. Other occasions don't count in this case, except to show how bad the justice system is and how bad mental health care is. But those are not on trial.
    2
  5. Pfft. Both are zero in matters of law. The real lawyer got fired for opposing the war on Palestine.
    1
  6.  @dudeonyoutube  Yes, Briahna.
    1
  7.  @dudeonyoutube  BTW, the facts of this case are recited in the Complaint, paragraphs 16 - 40. I see no reason to believe any of these three read it.
    1
  8. @oldmanemptyhouse7659  Where did I say it was true? "She claims a trainer . . . made that assertion." Show me where I got confused on that point. That she made such a claim is correct. She did. I didn't say it was true.
    1
  9. @FreefallSC  Totally wrong, but the algorithm censors me if I actually explain why.
    1
  10. @FreefallSC  It can be the very first time a person is objectively threatening, and self-defense is justified, even if his prior record was perfect. Or, a person may have a history of threatening others, and no matter how many times he did before, he did not do so this time. Then, given that self-defense is appropriate, there is the issue of proportionality. He also had a history of imitating Michael Jackson on the subway. Which way does that cut? Trick question, it proves nothing about what he did this time.
    1
  11.  @FreefallSC  Right. How does that contradict what I said? What matters is what he did this time. They will all be under subpoena to testify to what they saw him doing THIS time.
    1
  12.  @1JamesMayToGoPlease  And that is all that will matter. Actually.
    1
  13. @1JamesMayToGoPlease  So . . . Why the need to consider any other alleged incidents? Hm?
    1
  14.  @FreefallSC  Same question
    1
  15.  @1JamesMayToGoPlease  So your response to my question, pace OP, is that there is no need. Cool. 😊
    1
  16. @codythomas52  Then those witness reports concerning THIS incident are what matter to Penny's defense. Did you think you contradicted me?
    1