Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Mitt Romney SLAMS Tulsi Gabbard As Treasonous, Spreading ‘Russian Propaganda’ On Ukraine, US Biolabs" video.

  1. Good thought.
    9
  2. So, Romney doesn't want to secure and destroy these materials? But I thought they would fall into Russian hands. That's what the government told us.
    6
  3.  @episdosas9949  Wrong. Tulsi never said any weapons were made in labs or existed in labs funded by the US Department of Defense. Listen to her statement. Where is NULAND to clarify? Point me to that, I want to read it, no problem.
    3
  4.  @episdosas9949  BTW, Russian state television is banned, so I can't compare any more. How did you? Where did you get the text? Who translated it? They insist weapons, Nuland and Gabbard say potentially dangerous materials.
    3
  5. Note that neither the State Department nor Victoria Nuland has issued a clarification. Easy enough.
    2
  6.  @episdosas9949  Tell us what Tulsi said wrong. Compare her words to Nuland's. Word for word.
    2
  7.  @episdosas9949  More to the point --- why are you lying? When certain people say sic 'em, you do, like, automatically?
    2
  8.  @episdosas9949  Oh, you're incoherent. Okay, sorry. Blocked.
    2
  9.  @organicallypoweredlife1417  Please provide search terms. I have never heard her endorse regime change. But give us the evidence. Nothing can surprise me.
    1
  10.  @organicallypoweredlife1417  Sorry to hear, but no surprise. Will check it out (it's my birthday, so not today).
    1
  11. "Textualize" Gabbard herself? She took it out of the "proper framework?"
    1
  12. Richey now calls this tribal? HE just gave the most tribal, ad hominem criticism of Gabbard!
    1
  13. No!! We should allow the pathogens to be released! Weeee! All patriots agree.
    1
  14. So, Romney doesn't want to secure and destroy these materials? But I thought they would fall into Russian hands. That's what the government told us.
    1
  15. If Victoria Nuland told the truth about the "danger Russia will gain control" of these microbes, in our Department of Defense-funded biolabs, why are WE not demanding inspectors and threatening war, like we did in Iraq? Based on our actions in Iraq, it would stand to reason that we should be the party pushing for inspections.
    1
  16.  @falconeaterf15  From 1991? From 2004? And with all that Department of Defense funding (as you can read about on the US Embassy in Ukraine website), they can't get the Soviet materials cleaned up? So, it's as bad as Afghanistan? Then let's agree to independent inspectors. Get them some help. It's urgent, with the Russians so close.
    1
  17.  @organicallypoweredlife1417  Please provide search terms for that. We remember her as against regime change meddling in toto. But nothing would surprise.
    1
  18.  @rodneyroimatawhanga525  Where did you get this sheer nonsense? Listen to Nuland's statement under oath. Look up the US Embassy in Ukraine website. Nothing to do with FLU vaccine! DOD funds flu vaccines now?
    1
  19.  @rodneyroimatawhanga525  "She" and "it" need defining.
    1
  20. The Russians and the Chinese have been making accusations for months. Nuland is the one who came close to confirming them, and said there was a danger. Gabbard called for a cease-fire to secure all labs that may pose any risk and to clean them up. Nuland said that if anything escapes from a lab, it's the Russians' fault. I guess talking is easier than doing.
    1
  21.  @rodneyroimatawhanga525  No, what she SAID was that this news has international implications and all the organs of international cooperation, plus all the top players including the US, need to make it their first priority. If Russia and China were sincere in their official "expressions of concern," then they WOULD cooperate in a cease-fire and cleanup. If they fail to cooperate, then they must not have meant what they said about the risk that the labs pose. Ditto for Nuland, etc. It could not be more obvious.
    1
  22.  @rodneyroimatawhanga525  How so? That makes zero sense. If the Russians assert the labs are dangerous yet refuse to allow efforts to clean them up, that tells you everything. If the US says they may fall into Russian hands, which would be dangerous, yet the US does nothing, that speaks volumes as well. This is like the story about the wisdom of Solomon. No one sincerely worried would fail to press for a cease-fire and cleanup. We just had a pandemic. There IS no "green light."
    1
  23.  @rodneyroimatawhanga525  Who has the most to lose? Who is the most desperate? The most extremist elements of the Azov Battalion have the most to lose, and they have just been strengthened, at least temporarily, because of the Russian invasion. They are the most likely to use biological or chemical weapons, or other extreme measures, and they are not a state actor. They have infiltrated the military in Ukraine. There are reports they have threatened Zelensky. They are desperados. Inform yourself. This isn't a game.
    1
  24. Did you notice that Nuland never issued any clarification? Odd, no? It has been a while. Instead, we have media mobbing of anyone who expresses concern about the VERY materials Nuland claimed were dangerous. Isn't it up to Nuland to explain? (BTW What happened to COVID?)
    1
  25.  @billlincolnmd9159  So that's it! Tulsi wanted a cut! /s
    1