General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
L.W. Paradis
The Hill
comments
Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Marine Who Strangled Jordan Neely To Death CHARGED WITH MANSLAUGHTER In Subway Chokehold" video.
@coolkidrorose7860 Actually, it does. Some former Marines here have posted about it.
2
@MJMilano7 The only issue in this homicide case was whether Neely was sufficiently threatening this time to justify the use of potentially lethal force. There is no other question in this case. Whether he was severely mentally ill or a bad guy, or has an outstanding warrant, or any of that is not relevant, either. Did he pose a true threat in that moment, to justify what the Marine chose to do?
2
Excellent point.
2
Buy a car.
1
@arnoldrajib6700 I had no idea I was dealing with a lunatic. I wouldn't want to encounter you on the subway.
1
The only issue in this case was whether Neely was sufficiently threatening this time to justify the use of potentially lethal force. There is no other question in this case. Whether he was severely mentally ill or a bad guy, or has an outstanding warrant, or any of that is not relevant, either. Did he pose a true threat in that moment, to justify what the Marine chose to do? If he did, the Marine will be acquitted. Self-defense law is pretty simple.
1
The only issue in this homicide case was whether Neely was sufficiently threatening this time to justify the use of potentially lethal force. There is no other question in this case. Whether he was severely mentally ill or a bad guy, or had an outstanding warrant, or any of that is not relevant, either. Did he pose a true threat in that moment, to justify what the Marine chose to do? If he did, the Marine will be acquitted. If not, not. The victim's priors are irrelevant.
1
Neely is the dead one. Please try to follow.
1
Marines here have explained it. Impressive, actually.
1
The only issue is whether Neely was sufficiently threatening this time to justify the use of potentially lethal force in the moment. There is no other question in this case. Whether Neely was severely mentally ill or a bad guy, scary, annoying, or had an outstanding warrant, is not relevant, either. Did he pose a true threat in that moment, to justify what the Marine chose to do? If he did, the Marine will be acquitted. The system failed, that's for sure.
1
@coolkidrorose7860 I don't say he's guilty, either. Evidence is what is presented under oath in court. We will see.
1
@coolkidrorose7860 And now I have got to wonder whether our friendly conversation has been shadowed. 😂
1
@MJMilano7 I practiced in federal court, lol. You don't know enough to recognize when someone is giving you real information? The Marine might not be guilty. I am telling you the standard. I have not seen the evidence.
1
"Don't choke people" is still controversial.
1
The only issue is whether Neely was sufficiently threatening this time to justify the use of potentially lethal force. There is no other question in this case. Whether he was severely mentally ill or a bad guy, or has an outstanding warrant, or any of that is not relevant, either. Did he pose a true threat in that moment, to justify what the Marine chose to do? If he did, then the Marine will be acquitted.
1
Marines here have explained it. Actually, they do. It's impressive.
1
Not possible. How could anyone think this is the law??
1