L.W. Paradis
The Hill
comments
Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "China BACKS DOWN On 'Zero-Covid' After Massive Protests, Cites Weaker Variants And Vaccination Rates" video.
3
2
2
2
2
@mkhud50n They are almost certainly hiding the origins of the virus. They did hide the initial outbreak. I'm more interested in what else they are not telling the rest of the world, that they have an obligation to tell.
I was opposed to the lockdowns, by the way. Early (by Feb 1), short, and really hard may have made a difference. Mid-March to June 1 was just torment and economic ruin for millions, with very limited benefit, if any, and side effects we are still suffering from, including poor mental health, irrational fear, and the willingness to do anything they tell us to do to avoid another lockdown. The unethical and probably illegal vaccine mandates were a product of the irrational fear of COVID and of new lockdowns.
2
1
1
1
1
1
@davesears9681 I don't know, and don't think so, but I don't like this whole picture. Unacceptable risks, likely undertaken because of corruption, an accident, and very serious incentives to hide the accident and then to find ways to use the event as an opportunity -- sure. It would hardly be a new phenomenon. This kind of the game plan.
FTX and the 2008 financial crisis both worked a lot like that, and they had nothing to do with viruses. It's a very generic pattern, isn't it? FTX likely had more intent behind it than a legitimate accident would, but 2008 definitely has these features. The BP GoM spill, too, had a few of these features. Tony Hayward became a commodities trader after that and made vastly more money. Perverse incentives are structured that way.
But anyway, an actual grand conspiracy, instead of mini-conspiracies to cover up misdeeds along the way, is not impossible. I don't think there was anything like that going on, but I would never say you're wrong. I keep questions open until I'm really satisfied that I have a true answer, or that I'll never have an answer. :/
1
1
1
1
1
@rsaggar Agreed completely about origins; not as sure about vaccines, as I have family in an area that offered a variety of vaccines, including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, and Sinovac, and many chose Sinovac. My family got Pfizer as soon as they could, had no hesitancy at all about getting vaccinated, and now acknowledge the vaccines were a disappointment. Doctors in their region do not recommend boosters for the time being except for those with comorbidities or, of course, for those age 70 and older. They live in a non-ideological society in southern Europe, where saying stuff like this is not a cause for controversy, much less "cancellation." This is all "matter-of-fact" for them.
The safety/efficacy profile of each of the major vaccines is still something we don't have enough solid information about. You have got to wonder why.
Great talking to you, and it is heartening to hear that people still remember that brave Chinese doctor who went public, then died.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Well, you are far from being in charge of your own destiny if this is the fable you spin from Briahna's comments. Someone put you up to that.
It is never ignorant to ask a pointed question. I also wonder why China instituted actual, complete lockdowns, like you see in prisons. Do they know something about the virus that they are not sharing? I mean, apart from its origins, which they probably knew all along. Robbie was the one blathering, rather than acknowledging that China is an authoritarian country, that they have very likely covered up the virus origins, and that COVID's origins may not be all they are covering up.
I love how no one can ask questions. All questions are "questions." All questions have to be probed for their "subtext," so that we can label the speaker and call them out. In the meantime, funny how we missed the fact that we don't know the answer.
1
1
1