Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "David Zweig: Twitter RIGGED Covid Debate By Censoring 'Inconvenient' Information" video.

  1. Look, at least some of her questions are obviously devil's advocate. I don't disagree that she does deserve to be called on this one, though.
    3
  2. This censorship was all in one direction, so it is sinister for sure. But in general, facts are censored because they are harder to monitor for possible TOS violations, while really vicious trash talking is considered "opinion," so it is allowed to stand. Social media has a built-in bias to dumb everyone down. This has ALWAYS been a huge problem.
    2
  3. This is true, but NO ONE can censor at the behest of the government and have it not be a First Amendment violation. The government cannot use Twitter as its cat's paw.
    1
  4.  @TheLastKentuckyIrregular9524  Just saw this. You beat me to it!
    1
  5. This censorship was all in one direction, so it is sinister for sure. But in general, facts are censored because they are harder to monitor for possible TOS violations, while really vicious trash talking is considered "opinion," so it is allowed to stand. Social media has a built-in bias to dumb everyone down.
    1