Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "SHOCKING: Covid Vaccine Injury Claims IGNORED By Government, Big Pharma SHIELDED" video.

  1. If the side effects are SO rare, should be easy to compensate the injured fully, huh?
    29
  2. ​Nonsense. Countless people with "mild" side effects now have heart problems, memory problems, autoimmune conditions, fatigue, and generally diminished health. To minimize these is unethical. Their ability to work has been compromised. That alone is serious.
    23
  3.  @AnaLucia-wy2ii  If the side effects are SO rare, it should be very easy to compensate the injured, huh?
    16
  4. ​ @cassiescornerreviews6884  If the side effects are SO rare, should be easy to compensate the injured fully, huh?
    11
  5. ​ @cassiescornerreviews6884 If the side effects are SO rare, should be easy to compensate the injured fully, huh?
    9
  6. ​ @oceania2385  That's right, they were not.
    7
  7. ​ @cassiescornerreviews6884 "Got vaccinated?" With what? Three of the five BRICS declined mRNA-based vaccines, at least one for wholly scientific, not political, reasons. Most of Europe stopped vaccinating healthy young people years ago.
    7
  8. ​ @cassiescornerreviews6884  How so? I only look to published research available at the NIH website, in their free library of medicine, for my information. MIT also had an explanation of the new technologies, as did a number of other major universities. Were they all spreading "misinformation?" Wait. Is that you, Nina?
    6
  9.  @cassiescornerreviews6884  😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    5
  10. ​ @cassiescornerreviews6884  He was vaccine injured.
    4
  11. Say! I just had a brilliant idea! Develop a safe and effective vaccine!!
    4
  12.  @AnaLucia-wy2ii  Prior vaccines having one serious side effect per 100,000 were closely watched, limited, or withdrawn from use. Of course the majority are fine. The majority are supposed to be fine.
    3
  13. @AnaLucia-wy2ii  I think that's likely, and I certainly hope so. In prior vaccine clinical trials and subsequent distribution, one serious side effect per 100,000 fully immunized person was considered significant, and vaccines were sometimes withdrawn given such numbers. These vaccines, regardless of type, have caused far more side effects than that, possibly as many as one per 800. That means most of us won't meet anyone who had a serious side effect. The stories that it will come back to affect everyone is just more fear mongering.
    2
  14. They got very rich during the lockdown. There is no reason not to do it again.
    1
  15. ​ @skosh6359 They may be quite happy with the money, but so are Fauci, Collins, Gates, Pelosi, etc. This is why I absolutely always look to solid research, usually available at NIH or PLOS for free, and to ministries of health in Europe. Relying on American sources alone is no longer wise, sadly.
    1
  16. ​ @cassiescornerreviews6884  Three of the five BRICS declined mRNA based vaccines --- you can claim China and Russia had political motivations, but India certainly did not. It was purely based on science.
    1
  17. ​ @cassiescornerreviews6884  Could they all be lying? Remember lobotomies? That procedure garnered a Nobel Prize in Medicine. Maybe read White Coat, Black Hat. Reality check.
    1