Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Rand Paul On Protecting FREE SPEECH Online, DISCIPLINING Secret Service For FAILURE: Interview" video.

  1. Speaking of free speech, I keep getting accused of violating community standards, without citation. I have no idea what they mean, as I never trash talk or jeer.
    4
  2. The Court did not rule on substance but only on standing.
    2
  3.  @DonaldJoeKennedy  Thanks
    2
  4. 1000% Thank you
    1
  5. @augustgreig9420  "Standing" is a technical legal concept involving who has asserted a sufficient legal injury traceable to the defendant that they can come to court to sue. The real point is that the question of who has standing to sue comes before any ruling on the merits of the complaint. So, the alleged censorship, if true, might be a civil liberties violation, but the people who sued can't trace a specific injury they actually suffered to a specific defendant they want to hold responsible for it.
    1
  6. No they did not. Compare the Vullo case.
    1