General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
L.W. Paradis
Katie Halper
comments
Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Aaron Maté Slams 'McCarthyite' Smears u0026 'Embarrassing' Syria Reporting (Full interview)" video.
I appreciate why Aaron would be very reluctant to sue, and I respect that. I hope that this time he will. TYT did this for MONEY. They have to be forced to disgorge their profits. It matters for all the journalists who do not have Aaron's stature. This was so dirty, and there are people who'll be influenced by it. Anyway, if he decides not to, I respect that decision.
63
So true. They did.
17
@Bluebelle51 Dore did make a tasteless joke, embarassed a colleague, and he owed Ana an apology for doing it. He gave her a written apology, even though he knew it could be used against him later. Tells you pretty much all you need to know. And now Ana tries to come between Jimmy and Stef, his wife. Ana must be a sensitive soul all right. /s
8
Who are the leftists who defend anyone for embracing ethnic nationalism? Examples?
7
@brentshowers741 Gabbard cannot "veto" legislation.
7
@Bluebelle51 She was grotesque. Seriously.
7
@alanpaulsen6174 Absolutely.
6
@stevencoardvenice I agree.
5
Katie was calm and patient in response. Great contrast.
3
@Bluebelle51 This guy might be a bot?
2
@brentshowers741 I read the link. It does not say anything about Tulsi. I read it three times.
2
@gustavofinklstein9730 Right. So he gave her a written apology. AND just demonstrated that TYT was imitating Howard Stern in their broadcasting and office banter at the time. This all came out because Ana defamed Aaron Mate. Aaron could bring suit. Did you realize that? Vaush won't inform you.
2
@gustavofinklstein9730 So if a guy asks someone where she got her jeans because he'd like to buy a pair as a gift for his wife, he is implying his wife needs to dress better? That's a good one. It means he's a guy. He doesn't know about shopping.
2
@brentshowers741 I read this and I'm not clear on what you're saying. Who did what and why?
1
@brentshowers741 I read the entire resolution and I would have voted "no" as well. A pointed blaming of Hindus is one-sided and counterproductive. Do you get anti-vax Trumpers to behave by calling them deplorable? Or better yet, racist? What would that accomplish? A better question is, what, if anything, did Gabbard do to get a handful of offensive clauses removed, to create a better resolution?
1
@gustavofinklstein9730 Oh I see. So, your opinions are not fact-based in the smallest degree. Your prerogative. Thanks for letting us know.
1
@gustavofinklstein9730 Ad hominem means attacking the person. He attacked only the comment itself.
1
@gustavofinklstein9730 Blocked No worries
1
@DetectiveHouse I love people who think big.
1
@iorr98 There are a lot of factors that go into the decision. "New York Times malice" and the Larry Flynt case would have a bearing for sure. I still hope he does sue them, and I believe they would settle. Complete impunity for TYT does not strike me like a good outcome. :/
1