Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. I hope you're right. The lady looks worried. God, let it be an act.
    1
  2. He knew what a woman was when he picked Kamala. I think. Right?
    1
  3. One word: Roe. No, not because anyone normal likes abortion. Because no one feels comfortable with uncertainty, and everyone hates the thought that a 10 year old girl could be denied an abortion. So an Epstein could hold her fate in his hands. Think it through.
    1
  4.  @JohnDoe-i5z5c   That's not her fault. That's Biden's fault. Her background is outstanding, and the opinions, concurrences, and dissents she has written prove her capabilities. Same for Justice Barrett. They've both proved themselves. (BTW, I've never voted for a ticket with Biden on it. I saw through that 16 years ago.) Try reading some opinions and see. Or, let cable television decide for you. 😂
    1
  5.  @Shalompaz-m7w  Why is everyone
    1
  6.  @Shalompaz-m7w  who does not agree
    1
  7.  @Shalompaz-m7w  in
    1
  8.  @Shalompaz-m7w  visible
    1
  9.  @Shalompaz-m7w  Riddle me that
    1
  10. Hillary has lost it? She hates free speech as much as you do. You have so much in common now.
    1
  11. You only just noticed?
    1
  12. Clear-eyed view. :/
    1
  13.  @Tes7000  I don't think he meant equivalent. I didn't hear it that way.
    1
  14.  @oldschooljack3479  I have an odd question: are you a veteran? If not, a small business owner? The reason I ask is that the only people I know who think that way are veterans, small business owners, or both. I mean that literally.
    1
  15. Look, we borrow from one of the BRICS to finance a war against another. Maybe think this through . . .
    1
  16. Wow, Nuland handed them a job.
    1
  17. ​​ @Mal35m-ub6uj What law school did you go to? The lawyer arguing the case is supposed to explain the distinction they support to the Court. Is that too tough for them? Then they should get a different job.
    1
  18. @txt4r  That's not her fault. That's Biden's fault. Her background is outstanding, and the opinions, concurrences, and dissents she has written prove her capabilities. Same for Justice Barrett. They've both proved themselves. (BTW, I've never voted for a ticket with Biden on it. I saw through that 16 years ago.) Try reading some opinions and see. Or, let cable television decide for you. 😂
    1
  19. @hanabiber1823  That's just a slogan. She is as qualified as any other Justice -- easily.
    1
  20.  @txt4r  I clerked at the appellate level. You don't have a clue.
    1
  21. @txt4r  You know zero about it. I bet you've never seen a Supreme Court opinion, much less read thousands of them. Blocked for wasting my time. I have stuff to do today.
    1
  22. @txt4r  I'm getting censored now, for providing real information? Great, then you get blocked from my feed.
    1
  23.  @txt4r  Why are factual replies scents erred? Oh Gee, I Wonder Why.
    1
  24. @Mal35m-ub6uj  Look, they won't let me explain. I get ____ right away. Her question was proper. This is exactly how hypotheticals are framed. The lawyer is supposed to explain the legal distinction. Her question does NOT imply SHE thinks they are the same. She knows they're not. (Read her concurrence in the January 6th case. She voted with conservatives.)
    1
  25.  @Mal35m-ub6uj  Sadly, my replies go poof, like a puff of smoke.
    1
  26.  @jumpers500  Yes. I only joined YT during the COVID lockdown last year. I see the downside, too.
    1
  27. You must enjoy propaganda. Haaretz doesn't say this. He can denounce American "intellectuals" because they are stupid and vile, but he cannot answer Haaretz with this spiel.
    1
  28. So look at other sources concerning the US and Ukraine. Should anyway.
    1
  29. I would never go to any such demonstration because I am not convinced that there are no anti-Semites present. But the cause of maintaining the rules of war under the Geneva Conventions in every conflict, no matter how it started, is worth fighting for. That includes water to Gaza, not striking hospitals in Gaza, etc. There is zero evidence that most of those demonstrating in WESTERN cities are anti-Semites. Whether the anti-Semites who are there are taking advantage of the protests, and using the honest protestors as a cover, is a different matter. They are, or at least they are trying to. That's why I wouldn't go.
    1
  30. Unless you were thinking Saudi Arabia? PRC? I don't know. Have you researched it?
    1
  31. At this point, does anyone want to see Biden or Buttigieg?
    1
  32. So it took our security forces roughly 20 months to go get our nuclear secrets. An actual spy could have photographed them and sold them countless times.
    1
  33. She's an ignoramus.
    1
  34.  @michaeldoe7051  They certainly are for these purposes. You've been to their house? You know about their ethics when they find themselves under stress? You know about their private lives? You're not even supposed to know about their private lives.
    1
  35. Oooh, against free speech, are we?
    1
  36. No one else sees it's FAKE??
    1
  37. @tormentfromhell73 I'm sorry they took your bunny. That was mean.
    1
  38. @tormentfromhell73  Someone in this picture needs to be CTG's Donkey of the Day --- either the criminal for doing it, or Gutfeld for thinking it's real. If you don't have doubts, . . . STUPID.
    1
  39. I respect that young man so much for speaking out. Courageous.
    1
  40. @KHY 001 It's clearly insufficient as a legal definition. Colloquial language is perfectly fine for ordinary discussion. This is grammar policing, just like wokesters do.
    1
  41.  @nicwelch  It most certainly does include semi-automatics. That is the key feature.
    1
  42.  @nicwelch  Not everyone in the world minds seeing this. You do know about that part, correct? If not, there may be a qualification you lack as well -- a big one, in my opinion, and it's not semantic. Just my opinion.
    1
  43.  @scottosborn6193  Thank you.
    1
  44. @michaelhoule2134  Pfft. I didn't know they admitted preschoolers, or 3rd graders.
    1
  45. Oh, I can think of worse: Pay them for being wrong. Make them rich.
    1
  46.  @bsymissy  Exactly why did we go to war with Iraq?
    1
  47.  @williamdawes7866  I suggest you watch today's The Hill Rising, and find out what the whole world knows.
    1
  48. @Green Grugach Reading Sally Rooney over the past couple of years kept me sane.
    1
  49.  @peaceandlove2617  I assume all Americans of either party applaud a war they start or have a chance to enter or gain from. I think they want to see this one prolonged.
    1
  50.  @jeffengland2791  Briahna Joy Gray brings much stronger thinkers on her program.
    1