Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Justice Jackson raises eyebrows with 'questionable' comparison in major case" video.

The quote from Justice Jackson is exactly how law school teaches you to fashion hypotheticals. Why is one categorical classification valid and another a constitutional violation? A lawyer is supposed to be able to explain why to the Court.
2
This is exactly how questions are examined in law. The lawyer's job is to show how these cases are different.
2
@Jeffski82 Figures. And I don't support "gender affirming care," by the way. The phrase itself is advertising. Ugh.
2
@Jeffski82 The latest is, they let us see our own, so we have no idea whether anyone else can see what we replied. Also, some replies appear if you sort by the Newest tab, then scroll forever. 🙄
2
The quote from Justice Jackson is exactly how law school teaches you to fashion hypotheticals. Why is one categorical classification valid and another a constitutional violation? A lawyer is supposed to be able to explain why to the Court.
1
 @Mcmelcher1209 As long as you restrict this to Western European kids, be my guest. /s 😂 You're all nuts. Keep it to yourselves.
1
 @user-dc2dt2ts4b Parents are signing permission for this.
1
 @Kimbermom4908 Same place as mine?
1
@JohnDoe-i5z5c That's not her fault. That's Biden's fault. Her background is outstanding, and the opinions, concurrences, and dissents she has written prove her capabilities. Same for Justice Barrett. They've both proved themselves. (BTW, I've never voted for a ticket with Biden on it. I saw through that 16 years ago.) Try reading some opinions and see. Or, let cable television decide for you. 😂
1
@Shalompaz-m7w Why is everyone
1
@Shalompaz-m7w who does not agree
1
@Shalompaz-m7w in
1
@Shalompaz-m7w visible
1
@Shalompaz-m7w Riddle me that
1
@Mal35m-ub6uj What law school did you go to? The lawyer arguing the case is supposed to explain the distinction they support to the Court. Is that too tough for them? Then they should get a different job.
1
@txt4r That's not her fault. That's Biden's fault. Her background is outstanding, and the opinions, concurrences, and dissents she has written prove her capabilities. Same for Justice Barrett. They've both proved themselves. (BTW, I've never voted for a ticket with Biden on it. I saw through that 16 years ago.) Try reading some opinions and see. Or, let cable television decide for you. 😂
1
@hanabiber1823 That's just a slogan. She is as qualified as any other Justice -- easily.
1
@txt4r I clerked at the appellate level. You don't have a clue.
1
@txt4r You know zero about it. I bet you've never seen a Supreme Court opinion, much less read thousands of them. Blocked for wasting my time. I have stuff to do today.
1
@txt4r I'm getting censored now, for providing real information? Great, then you get blocked from my feed.
1
@txt4r Why are factual replies scents erred? Oh Gee, I Wonder Why.
1
@Mal35m-ub6uj Look, they won't let me explain. I get ____ right away. Her question was proper. This is exactly how hypotheticals are framed. The lawyer is supposed to explain the legal distinction. Her question does NOT imply SHE thinks they are the same. She knows they're not. (Read her concurrence in the January 6th case. She voted with conservatives.)
1
@Mal35m-ub6uj Sadly, my replies go poof, like a puff of smoke.
1
@charlesprice7608 Let's hear your legal argument. Have at it.
1
@charlesprice7608 Jackson's quote is exactly how law school teaches you to fashion hypotheticals. Why is one categorical classification valid and another considered a constitutional violation? A lawyer is supposed to be able to explain why to the Court. That's the idea. But instead of reading and thinking, let cable television tell you what to believe.
1
@Jeffski82 I hope they let you see my answer.
1
@charlesprice7608 I don't even know what Sunny said.
1
@charlesprice7608 What do you mean by "four years of constitutional law?" I know of no law program, JD or LLM, that offers "four years of constitutional law." I was a federal appellate clerk. I do know what I'm talking about.
1
@charlesprice7608 We are both being scents erred here, btw.
1
@Jeffski82 When we tell someone that they or we are subject to sense r sheep, that goes poof as well.
1
@MisguidedLogic America has no left, extreme or otherwise. This is a nonsense narrative. Show me a trans Black Panther . . .
1