Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "The Duran"
channel.
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
You seem to discount the power of Western/Anglosphere propaganda. Think back when the USSR collapsed. (I agree with SFC that it did not have to, by the way.) The Soviets were not so weak relative to Reagan and Thatcher that they had no hope of reforming and continuing. American society, in particular, is much weaker than it seems -- and every crisis proves it. (E.g., COVID followed by waves of riots, drug overdoses, shootings and mass murders) The typical American college grad knows less mathematics and science than a European 17-year-old, or a Russian 14-year-old, and is more likely to need (really need, not feel like they need) psychotherapy. The Soviets folded anyway, because they believed they needed to spend their treasure on useless armaments. Nor did they believe the 1990s would be as devastating as they were. They were too optimistic, actually. The same thing could happen now. Look, Greece is in the state it is for a reason. It blinked. It was persuaded that it had to. Hmm . . . No it didn't. A deft combination of smoke and mirrors, plus the will to be without principles or mercy when embarking on war, keeps the dollar where it is. It's still working.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So far, Putin's only clear success has been with the currency -- he proved, without any doubt, that Western financial interests cannot destroy the Russian economy using decrees and papers written in poisoned ink. Thank God for everyone on Earth that he did succeed in that (Greece, take note! China and India certainly have).
Even that success was ultimately undermined by the criminal sabotage of the Nordstream pipeline.
Why don't we all admit that overall, this WAR has been a disaster, for all concerned? Putin was wrong not to try to avoid this, first by calling an emergency session of the UNSC, with proof -- which he had -- of Ukrainian troops planning another, more massive offensive against the people of the Donbass. That was the only ethical course, the only place to start. He DIDN'T start there. No free pass on that, sorry. Never. How can anyone excuse not doing everything possible to avoid this WAR (not "special intervention," my GOD).
Every war that can be avoided, MUST be avoided, paraphrasing Chris Hedges and many others. The sane ones, the ones with hearts, minds. To fail to do everything to avoid a war during a pandemic, just when people were looking forward to a more normal spring, was unconscionable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why don't we all admit that overall, this WAR has been a disaster, for all concerned? Putin was wrong not to try to avoid this, first by calling an emergency session of the UNSC, with proof -- which he had -- of Ukrainian troops planning another, more massive offensive against the people of the Donbass. That was the only ethical course, the only place to start. He DIDN'T start there. No free pass on that, sorry. Never. How can anyone excuse not doing everything possible to avoid this WAR (not "special intervention," my GOD).
Every war that can be avoided, MUST be avoided, paraphrasing Chris Hedges and many others. The sane ones, the ones with hearts, minds. To fail to do everything to avoid a war during a pandemic, just when people were looking forward to a more normal spring, was unconscionable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LVArturs On the contrary, the initial economic sanctions of the Russian Federation were swift (no pun intended) and literally unprecedented, and at least some people in the US/UK were sure they would cause the Russian economy to implode. When it looked like Ukraine and Russia might come to some cease-fire agreement, UK intervened directly to tell Zelensky to desist. As for "slow-walking support," first, what do you call these 12-figure appropriations? Second, what do you call the sabotage of the Nordstream pipeline? Third, suppose that what you call "slow-walking" is just a reflection of the struggle in the US between the hawks and the ultra-hawks, as well as the realization by both that the "best" they can do is bleed Russia; they cannot expect to beat the Russians. It would be materially impossible, absent changing the character of the war yet again and taking a bigger risk than they are prepared to do, not to mention that it could unravel the skein in a lot of other places, including Taiwan, the Korean peninsula, Iraq, other parts of the Middle East . . . What evidence do you have that the Ukrainian military as currently constituted -- meaning without American advisors and possibly even foreign troops -- could make use of that materiel? Do you consider any of the reports that weapons shipped to Ukraine are already being sold and turning up in places like Africa credible? I don't claim to know, I claim the reports are quite plausible.
Sorry, what you've said makes no sense based on the information I believe to be accurate. I will admit that we are all steeped in propaganda. For both the war and the pandemic, I've looked to background information from well before each one materialized. Only there have I found anything that strikes me as honest and clear. And I see no good guys in this picture.
This is quite apart from the issue of whether the Western military-financial powers should be meddling in Eastern Europe at all. You seem displeased that they are "slow-walking support," when there is no reason they should be offering that brand of "support" at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LVArturs Sorry, we've already been through that. You are wasting my time.
Your sedition scenario, after the US first supported a coup in Ukraine, is beyond laughable. So who, exactly, is the traitor? Maybe you live in an area that does not allow access to information.
Anyway, I'm going to block you from my thread. If you were sincerely interested in the truth, you'd do what everyone who has that interest does: you would consult the preeminent sources of information on Russia from well BEFORE Russia invaded Ukraine. Stephen F. Cohen at the 92nd Street Y comes to mind, when everyone present said "you don't think Russia would actually invade Ukraine, do you?" and he answered, yes, I most certainly do think Putin might invade. Those are the types of sources I use. (He died before the recent escalation of the war began, of lung cancer. Huge loss to mankind.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@coursecorrection870 This has been addressed ad nauseum. A small, heavily armed, heavily financed group that infiltrates the armed forces can have vastly more influence than the voters do, and reports that Azov-infiltrated troops were ready to shell the Donbass region again, before this invasion, turned out to be true. At this juncture, both the West and Putin are strengthening the neo-Nazis' hand, and it's doubtful that Zelensky has been functioning as a head of state, or that he even can. The difference may be (I mean may literally: hence, maybe not, too early to tell) that the West has no problem with the Nazis in Donbass, while Russia most certainly does.
So . . . You reject the Right to Protect? Interesting. Or is that only an American Right, like so many others?
All you've done is parrot the talking points you've heard. Is Abby Martin a propagandist? Kim Iversen, Chris Hedges, Aaron Mate, Anne-Laure Bonnel? The analysis of Stephen F. Cohen, from several years ago? See his interview at the 92nd Street Y, where he predicts where we are now. For Bonnel's reporting, you need to speak French, but her documentaries have subtitles. Oh, but you haven't mastered autocorrect yet, I forgot. Before thinking you should decide the fates of millions, learn to spell and write without stringing together buzz words and cliches and utter nonsense, and letting autocorrect write for you. Take a class or something.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
During the Cold War, the socialist experiment that was the Soviet Union greatly enhanced the living standards throughout Europe by maintaining pressure on the ruling class to behave. Now, the Russian Federation, after having been gutted in the 90s under the ascendancy of Clinton-Blair neoliberalism and globalization, has come back strong and is challenging the West, which in turn is being gutted by its oligarchs. Well, the solution is simple --- we shall blame Russia. I'm not surprised current relations are worse. Bourgeois Norwegians in particular got a lot of free stuff thanks to the Soviets, back when their ruling class had to prove it could feed, house, educate, and heal everyone "just as well as the commies can, or better."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1