Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "WATCH: Elise Stefanik Explodes At NYC Public School Chief Over Teacher Who Posted Pro-Hamas Content" video.

Personnel matters are confidential. He just told you that he was advised by counsel not to get into specifics, while litigation and administrative process are pending.
4
He stood up to this nonsense better than any Ivy League president did. He was right to refuse to provide details about pending litigation and personnel actions. That's exactly what he was supposed to do.
3
Finally a witness is holding Stefanik accountable for her performance art.
3
@fish9905 You are being so duped. All of these performances are for campaign financing.
3
Nothing done? Stefanik is fundraising. Fundraising is Job 1.
3
@warr1973 He stood up to Stefanik and refused to discuss details about pending litigation and personnel actions. That was exactly what he was supposed to do. Funny, the president of Columbia University was unable to stick the landing.
3
@sketchartist1964 Psst. People will say anything they get paid to say. Have you noticed? 🤣
2
@sketchartist1964 SMH. If state schools ignore due process, the taxpayers will be on the hook. Do the math.
2
@Lauwit The consequence is always money changing hands.
2
This guy made more sense than any of the Ivy League presidents.
2
@koppsr He very clearly stated that he was advised by counsel not to comment on pending matters. This isn't Facebook Gossip Hour, this is real. And Stefanik knows it.
1
@sketchartist1964 They are asking for fundraising purposes. Of course they know that his answer is true. This is a performance, for 💰, to finance the upcoming election. How does anyone STILL get taken in?? Wow, just wow. Check on how much they've pulled in since they started these pointless hearings.
1
@sketchartist1964 My clear, cogent, and unequivocal reply is nowhere to be found now. I wonder why that is? Of course he's telling the truth and of course they know he is.
1
@sketchartist1964 Don't you find it funny that clear statements of fact or law get disappeared, but trash talk is amplified? Huh. Odd.
1
@sketchartist1964 No he is not. He stood up to Congress better than any of the Ivy League presidents did. He is not supposed to comment on pending matters, whether they be pending in administrative hearings or in litigation. Because he represents state schools, he is bound by Due Process. Blabbing could end up costing the public tax money.
1
@sketchartist1964 I hope you can see the above.
1
@sketchartist1964 It's not a matter of how it sounds. Harvard has a private foundation to cover all costs of lawsuits. Public schools have property taxes. You know that! Look at your bill.
1
Stefanik was the one wearing blue. Good call.
1
@alexandriaocasio-smollett5078 Stefanik is doing it for fundraising.
1
 @fish9905 You believe this? How is that critical thinking? I want to see some evidence.
1
@fish9905 Oh I see. You just believe what the performance-for-fundraising Congress members spout.
1
@Lauwit Stefanik made money, at your expense. You don't see through it.
1
No, he's standing up to rotten little fundraiser Stefanik. FINALLY. Not one president of an Ivy showed any backbone.
1
@robertaccorsini4663 Personnel matters are confidential. He has every right to testify to that fact.
1
@MissMU-xi3kh Finally, someone stood up to Stefanik and showed some backbone.
1
@BishopVampire69 Oh that made sense.
1
@cplmpcocptcl6306 There most certainly is a measure of free speech in public schools. See Tinker v. Des Moines. You don't shed your constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door.
1
 @cantthinkofaname750 "Hate speech," so-called, is legal.
1
HA.
1
You all fall for her performance art? She got her five minutes of fundraising time. The other Congress members want their turn.
1
@mikeottersole He answered correctly: as he indicated, he should not discuss pending litigation or pending administrative personnel matters. Stefanik must know that much. Looks like the joke is on her fans.
1
 @LickyTee Because some talking head on Fox said so.
1