Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Amy Coney Barrett Grills Attorney In Key Case That Could Rock Janunary 6 Prosecutions" video.

  1. First of all, Justice Barrett was examining the argument that they should be held guilty in violation of a specific subpart of a specific federal statute, contrary to what this lawyer is arguing. He's trying to get the case overturned. Justice Barrett seems skeptical of his argument. Second, there is no word salad, from anyone. Look at the opening brief if you actually care about what's going on. The first page will tell you.
    2
  2. Barrett's questions suggest exactly the opposite.
    1