Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Glenn Greenwald"
channel.
-
106
-
66
-
48
-
42
-
38
-
36
-
32
-
31
-
28
-
25
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
@jimpollard113 The jury agreed. It was, however, within the law to convict, and a different jury might have thought otherwise. The facts were totally misrepresented by MSM, and Rittenhouse, a minor facing adult charges (which I do not agree with doing to any kid), was smeared. And now, the law with respect to self-defense is being misrepresented.
I see nothing good here. Less bad than a conviction for any intentional homicide, which had zero support in the evidence. No one standing up to question the practice of trying juveniles as adults in the first place. Rittenhouse, a lost and traumatized kid, being lionized(!!!) And still being smeared, for that matter. MSM doubles down on smearing him. Nope, nothing good.
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Glenn, a question.
There seems to be a larger pattern that repeats too often to be happening by chance.
The DNC keeps creating lose-lose scenarios: "Russiagate," obviously; Sandmann; Brett Cavanaugh; Amy Coney Barrett; Hunter Biden and his laptop; Rittenhouse; hysteria and unwarranted accusations concerning January 6th, as if the reality wasn't bad enough. The deification of Bill Gates; the continuing power of the Clintons; the nomination of Joe and Kamala. Then of course reneging on the public option, the $15 minimum wage, losing the two impeachment trials, and so forth, . . . even misleading voters about the size of the stimulus checks. Why are they doing this?
Let's take Justice Barrett. There should have been no nomination, as early voting in the presidential election had already begun. Instead, Judge Barrett was nominated and confirmed, and mercilessly abused and personally maligned during the process to a degree that I don't think anyone before her had ever suffered -- not even Kavanaugh. (At least Kavanaugh had a witness he could confront.) So, IOW, everything that shouldn't have happened, happened. The worst-case scenario was engineered into existence with a lot of help from the DNC -- with them imitating some of Trump's most repugnant traits and topping him.
What's up with all that? What do they get out of it?
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Let's see what Libs of Tik Tok has actually done:
On the one hand, collecting videos actually, voluntarily posted on social media by various people, particularly those teaching young children and minors in general, is a public service. People have a right to know who is forming the young, and whether they have sound judgment. No argument!
On the other hand, Libs of Tik Tok didn't just "curate" these videos. She made extremely inflammatory comments, accusing the makers of the videos of some of the most heinous crimes against children. Not hyperbole; she really did call for arrests for what is essentially free speech.
You see a good guy in this picture? Lorenz, by the way, is the last person to expose Libs of Tik Tok, if anyone should. Big "if."
Sure Libs of Tik Tok is a public figure. Don't go down the "power differential" rabbit hole. Anyone can destroy anyone now. We all know that.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What "heritage" do you mean? As an example, if you are Irish, is there any impediment to learning Gaelic, Irish folk dances, going to church every Sunday, reading Joyce or Sally Rooney? If you are English, you can't trace your ancestry, study Beowulf and The Faerie Queen, act in Shakespeare plays, become a Russellian agnostic, support the royals? Who is holding you back? Le champ est libre.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nope, more than that. Collecting videos that various people actually, voluntarily posted on social media, particularly those teaching young children and minors in general, is a public service in my view. People, especially parents, have a right to know.
But Libs of Tik Tok didn't just "curate" these videos. She accused the makers of the videos of some of the most heinous crimes against children. Not hyperbole; she really did call for arrests for what is essentially free speech.
You see a good guy in this picture? Lorenz, by the way, is the last person to expose Libs of Tik Tok, if anyone should. She is one of the worst hypocrites I have ever seen. And she's incompetent. Also, I disagree with power differential arguments, in principle. (We can distinguish governmental actors, including their major contractors vs. all others -- that makes sense.) But anyone can destroy anyone, now. We all know it, too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The business about crossing state lines with a gun is pure red herring. There was no evidence he did.
Two factors are under deliberation: (1) a person cannot contribute to creating the need for using lethal force to defend their life, and then claim perfect self-defense. (2) In using lethal force to defend their life, a person cannot act recklessly, given the circumstances.
The real tragedy is that under Wisconsin law, carrying that assault-type rifle openly, at age 17, is not a crime. Let that sink in. After how many mass shootings, they still can't pass reasonable gun laws? To cover MINORS, in public, not in their own dwelling, at least? Apparently not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sbondesson You are welcome. Their freedom to smear people with impunity is shocking. Now, the line between uncovering facts in the world, and reporting on what people believe, thanks to social media amplification, has been blurred to such a degree that I wonder whether anyone would settle with a Richard Jewel today, absent a hashtag hysteria.
The one newspaper that refused to settle with Jewel, on the ground that they reported the news as best as could be determined at the time, according to them, won in the end. You can probably imagine what is likely to happen now, without reading any more than you already have. But it is a horrible story, because a hero who saved lives during a terrorist attack was smeared. He got his reputation back, but it took forever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have no problem at all with Libs of Tik Tok "curating" videos that adults themselves voluntarily posted. In some instances, it may be a public service. I tread carefully around any "power differential" arguments as well. Also, it must be known by now that whatever a person posts will subsequently escape their control, and whoever doesn't know that by now is probably too dim to teach.
However, in this case, Libs of Tik Tok actually accused people of the worst crimes and called for their arrest, when all they could point to was a First Amendment-protected video. Sorry, I won't bite. None of the videos I saw were illegal, and some were probably parodies. All of that stuff is constitutionally protected. Whether their judgment is so poor they need to have observers in their classes or be suspended or fired is not for me to say -- or for Libs of Tik Tok to say, either. Schools have well-paid administrators. They can do their jobs for once.
I once read that nobody likes the First Amendment, not really. I see what they meant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@unknownknowable Good points across the board. All of these presentations are not alike, obviously.
As far as what is taught in school: lots of kids are in one-parent families, blended families, have unmarried parents, or are being raised by same-sex married couples, or even a drag queen father. Before high school, the emphasis should be on bullying prevention. Everyone's family is a nice family, everyone is welcome in school regardless of who their parents are. That's what you tell first graders. Later, you say more. (It's called puberty, and needs to be respected.)
The mayor where I live is in a same-sex interracial marriage and they have a young daughter. Richard Nixon's stunning granddaughter, who is big in regional theatre, was married to a man, got divorced, and many years later married a woman. They are raising a daughter, too. No one should ever say a peep to these kids. Young kids have vulnerable moments and should never be teased about their family.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1