Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "" video.

  1. Without crediting Ritter (I have no reason to think one way or another about his reporting), we do know that MSM is highly incentivized to make us think that the coming winter catastrophe is "worth it," and that "victory is right around the corner." This delays the inevitable economic fallout of the NATO/WEF position on this.
    14
  2. AMEN
    7
  3. Americans are paid to meme, they are not paid to know stuff.
    5
  4.  @Jakeupbandit  The Minsk Accords should have been respected. But that's no fun.
    2
  5. You sound exceptionally knowledgeable. Could you point us to what to read, etc.?
    2
  6. Russia is not even using air power the way the US does ("Shock and Awe"). What makes anyone think they will use tactical nuclear weapons?
    2
  7.  @stigandrmyrardalur5208  Just block anyone who says "cope." This one's easy.
    1
  8.  @jaemate21  Better develop "alternative" energy by breakfast.
    1
  9.  @jaemate21  Fine, go right ahead. It's not Russia and its supporters saying this. It's anti-vaxxers. /s 😂
    1
  10. I think Kim is the only one making sense . . . much more so than Ritter. MSM is just agitprop to make us think the coming winter is "worth it."
    1
  11. This would never surprise me. False flags is our world.
    1
  12.  @Trying858  I agree with this. MSM is obviously not telling the truth. It never reported Iraq truthfully, much less this war. Yet I don't find Ritter highly credible, either. Simply because MSM is worthless does not mean Ritter is a reliable authority. The one thing about Ritter is that he does not have any economic incentive to lie or prevaricate, which is not a small thing.
    1
  13.  @babaluto  Agreed
    1
  14.  @ChucksSEADnDEAD  Ha ha ha . . . don't be a fool. Get your cut for that one! BTW, what's the going rate for that? I don't know if it's very good. . . . Unless it's false flag. That might "create value."
    1
  15.  @jenni0278  History and geography is for sissies. Memes, twerking, and day trading is where it's at.
    1
  16.  @xiaodaigu5659  You have no evidence for that whatsoever. So, why do you believe it, and repeat it? Multipolarista just did a video on who HAS been starting wars, all over the globe, based on US Congressional sources and similar authoritative materials. I suggest you look at that, and better yet, read the actual sources. That's how you find out real stuff.
    1
  17. Russia has never used its air power the way the US does ("Shock and Awe"). What you are proposing means no more basic resources for any US allies from Russia.
    1
  18. They do not need WMDs to win this war. What is the objective now? It is not even clear what they want now. They should have secured Crimea, taken control of the Donbass as an independent, Russia-allied region, and possibly created a corridor between the two. That is maximalist, and should have been accomplished without escalating the war in the first place. And once they did invade, they should have completed the "special military operation" by April. This has been a brutal disgrace, coming on the heels of a pandemic and creating millions of refugees from some of Europe's poorest regions. The destruction of housing stock is a disgrace, never mind the civilian deaths.
    1
  19. Kim's commentary is the only rational one here. I am not impressed with MSM or Ritter, needless to say.
    1