Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "" video.

  1.  @taragnor  Gideon v. Wainwright, US Supreme Court decision in 1963. Duh. There was no right to a lawyer at public expense before 1963.
    5
  2. If a commercial jet is a common carrier, the issue is not so cut and dry. You may well have a constitutional right to board, and the burden is on HER to prove that there is a compelling reason to prohibit you from boarding, and that there is no other way to alleviate any legitimate government concern about letting you on. "Good luck, sweetie."
    4
  3.  @taragnor  The Fourteenth Amendment didn't exist back then. And the right to a lawyer at public expense did not exist back then, either.
    4
  4.  @taragnor  P. S. Who duped you? And did you pay them?
    2
  5.  @taragnor  Okay. The other comment sounds like someone else wrote it. Federal appellate courts have found a right to travel by plane when no other means exist (such as international travel), but I haven't read the cases, so I don't know on what basis. Entering and leaving a state from any other state is a constitutional right for sure. What's maddening is that everyone suddenly forgot who has the burden to prove a restriction is necessary. It is always the government that has to prove it is necessary. Of course there are times when it can, because there is a compelling reason for it, and that's fine. But it has to prove it. It's not on some *******'s say so.
    2
  6. If a SINGLE ONE of these people would ADMIT they do not know what they quite obviously DO NOT KNOW, and propose STUDIES, and basically act scientifically humble, it would be quickly forgiven. All they have to do is the right thing right now. But they won't. Why?
    1
  7.  @onenationunderground2360  Thanks for @ me! Now you're in my notifs thread and I can block you.
    1
  8.  @noodleshop7468 unclear as it gets I wonder if some of my posts are shadowed, and you then confused me with someone else. We already talked about all that.
    1
  9.  @taragnor  See the ACLU page on the no-fly list. It was declared unconstitutional as it stood, giving those targetted no notice or opportunity to be heard, nearly 10 years ago. Maybe you don't know stuff. Could that be it?
    1