Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "The Re-Education of Jordan Peterson: Why His Clinical Psychology License is Under Threat" video.
-
@@jassasingh9880 I used to think that. Then the meth labs invaded the lovely small towns all over the US. I shudder to think what opioids have done, to the once wonderful places. As for Canada, I could never get in, and it's too cold anyway, and with strange politics now, that I cannot comprehend. Anyway, thank you so much!
Where my family lives has the same weather as Rome! :) I lived in Paris, and the quality of life was lower there, than where I plan to go. The world has become very strange. I would never have predicted the last three years, not by any stretch, not ever.
18
-
9
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
@BrotherAlpha First of all, what is your source? Was a multivariate analysis performed? Second, why would such a miracle drug require mandating? That doesn't even make sense. Everyone would want it, wouldn't they? You simply have to persuade them. That shouldn't be difficult. Third, why would European countries known for exceptional infant, childhood and teenage health, such as Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and others of the same caliber in health care, not be recommending the vaccine for young people, and holding off on boosters for those under 50? Why would they do that? (My source is their ministries of health, all of which have pages in English in addition to their languages.) Why would France outlaw mandates for minors? Not rescind, but make it illegal to ask a minor about vaccine status or proof of vaccination? Fourth, why would a recently published German study show that at least 20% of unexpected deaths at home may be associated with heart damage not from illness but from the vaccine? How could that happen? Fifth, why were my relatives in Europe advised not to get boosters? What new information prompted that advice from their (highly qualified) doctors? One of them is 72.
A reason for mandates is always to protect others. We assume that normal, competent adults will want to protect themselves. The vaccines do NOT protect others. We know that now. We also know we were actively misled into believing they did.
The statistic you cited -- are you sure it doesn't pertain to the childhood measles vaccine? The measles vaccine is known to reduce all-cause mortality. Live attenuated vaccines are the ones that are most likely to show that effect.
Look at all these inhuman people, who "don't matter." A human person such as yourself must be lonely by now. How do you stand it?
WOW am I glad I can get out of the West. Thank gawd for the language barrier, too.
P. S. Does Novak Djokovic count?🤣
6
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tripe2237 Well, in the US under the First Amendment, it is unlikely this conduct could be disciplined in any way, and I agree with free speech (see Nadine Strossen and Erwin Chermerinsky). On the other hand, you give great reasons why this man should not be listened to. I feel more and more sorry for him, frankly. HE is not well.
"JP creates chaos and mental distress in his fans and detractors alike. Read these comments and tell me he doesn't. He's doing it in this video!" Assuming that is true, my response would be, so what? In the US, that is no reason to curtail anyone's freedom of speech and expression, and at the rate things are going, the US won't have that one civil right, the only one that truly sets the country apart, for much longer.
All someone has to do to discredit nearly any demonstration is bring a swastika, and there are people who won't see through it -- they will be afraid to ask who brought the swastika and to what purpose. This is a bigger problem than any of Peterson's insipid grievance mongering.
He doesn't see patients anyway. I wouldn't advise going after him in this manner. It creates another pseudo martyr. Some of the stuff they have cited him for is frankly nutty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tripe2237 But that is exactly my point. Peterson is not treating patients. He has no captive audience, no persons dependent on him for their psychological well being, and only a fan club that would do well to find a different person to take advice from -- but they are all adults, they are not presumed to be vulnerable, or to be consulting him from a position of vulnerability. Trying to yank his license is giving him exactly the publicity he craves, so that he can go on the largest platforms in North America with his grievances. The only time it would be sensible to do yank his license would be when it actually is imperative to protect PATIENTS. But he no longer sees patients. And unless he is lying, actual patients did not complain. (Lying about the proceeding against him would be something they could take into account, however.)
Having a license to practice psychology isn't an endorsement of his political views. And in the US, a lawyer can state that he supports eugenics without having his license lifted. What he can't do is demonstrate that he has contempt for his oath to support and defend the Constitution. Pretending that eugenics is the law and inducing people who come to him for advice to believe that it is the law, and that the 14th Amendment permits it, would be grounds for disbarment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1