Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "WATCH: Caroline Kennedy Slams Cousin RFK Jr. as "Dangerous" and a "Predator" in Video to Senate" video.

@machsimillian14 Yeah, our funding of Wuhan was a real help to the world all right. The scores of biolabs in Ukraine are as well, I am sure.
9
@ileanahernandez1709 How do you know? I don't claim it is or isn't. She left a lot out. Did the family discuss this? Did no one suggest that a young teen should not keep raptors unsupervised? Were these chicks alive? Then why wasn't it stopped? What sort of blender? The ordinary ones from the 1970s weren't capable of this -- but people with means can acquire better ones, in all likelihood. This letter was lazy and mean.
5
@TD1237 Her letter was all emotion and political leanings. This passes for a solid argument now? Trump World all right!
4
@Skiddoo42 My meaning is that she's rich. The fact that you and I suffer is not something she cares about.
4
SOMETHING has got to change. I disagree with a lot of what Bobby Jr. says, and I think his qualifications are marginal, but to sweep aside the important points he does make is deeply wrong. Why didn't Caroline stick to facts? I trust her less than Bobby.
4
 @mwmatthews1 The burden is on her to support her accusations. If she knew about this bizarre conduct, did she tell anyone at the time? As an animal lover and vegetarian, it's unfathomable to me.
4
@teacup-q3n Great point
3
@mwmatthews1 Badly! If he is so irrational, how did he ever win a single case against major global corporations, which have teams of outstanding lawyers? Has Caroline ever brought any cases against polluters? Working-class paralegal Erin Brockovich did more. 😒 The right way is to acknowledge the good, then calmly go step by step, showing why he is objectively not qualified for this position. This was lazy and sensational.
3
@mwmatthews1 So, because this isn't a trial, sensationalism is fine, rather than taking the time to bring forward solid evidence? How do you think Trump keeps getting away with it?
3
Uncle Teddy wasn't a "predator?"
3
@teacherguy5084 Oh, I see. We better not ask questions. We better get in line. I still remember when all of Hollywood and all the hippies living on communes believed this stuff. Even Jenny McCarthy promoted her book on Oprah. I didn't swallow that, either. Did you?
2
@teacherguy5084 As a vegetarian, I cannot imagine knowing about this and doing nothing. I adore animals.
2
@TheJacksnipe It's not funny. Forgive me, but . . . 😒
2
Not her problem.
2
@hjm5885 Did she say that anyone put a stop to it? Or that they discussed it as a family? Or that anyone said falconing might be inappropriate for unsupervised teenagers? Or that these poor baby animals went into a blender alive? This is sensationalism.
2
@annarichardson8284 They don't know either way. We are way past post-truth, well into entitlement to have every fantasy affirmed.
2
@louispouliot4102 "Both?"
1
@teacup-q3n You're a rock star! 😉😊
1
 @dianegroves1141 Did she report his bizarre conduct at the time? As a vegetarian and animal-lover, I can't imagine standing by and doing nothing.
1
@mwmatthews1 You support what keeps alienating people.
1
@juliehodges5592 I thought this was appalling. This is exactly how they repelled so many people, by lying about Trump and being hypocritical, when a calm recitation of facts would have been sufficient. (The problem is, they agree with Trump when he favors the MIC and Wall Street.) (By the way, Uncle Teddy wasn't a "predator?")
1
If he is so irrational, how did he ever win a single case against major global corporations, which have teams of outstanding lawyers? Has Caroline ever brought any cases against polluters? Working-class paralegal Erin Brockovich did more. 😒 The truthful way to handle this is to acknowledge the good, then calmly go through point by point on why he is nevertheless unqualified, and show that the case against him is uncontrovertable. These tactics aren't working. How do you think Trump got in??
1
I thought this was appalling. This is exactly how they repelled so many people, by lying about Trump and being hypocritical, when a calm recitation of facts was sufficient. (The problem is, they agree with Trump when he favors the MIC and Wall Street.)
1
@rsvy91368 How would you know? If someone saw baby chicks mutilated, why didn't they intervene? I would have.
1
If he is so irrational, how did he ever win a single case against major global corporations, which have teams of outstanding lawyers? Has Caroline ever brought any cases against polluters? Working-class paralegal Erin Brockovich did more. 😒 The truthful way to handle this is to acknowledge the good, then calmly go through point by point on why he is nevertheless unqualified, and hammer it home. This letter was nothing more than a lazy smear.
1
 @nualamartyn4918 If you speak French, I recommend listening to Clémence Guetté. Find out what real intelligence sounds like.
1
@rhymereason3449 So then provide facts, not character assassination. This was disgraceful.
1
If he is so irrational, how did he ever win a single case against major global corporations, which have teams of outstanding lawyers? Has Caroline ever brought any cases against polluters? Working-class paralegal Erin Brockovich did more. 😒 The truthful way to handle this is to acknowledge the good, then calmly go through point by point on why he is nevertheless unqualified, and hammer it home. But that takes real work. This was a lazy smear. No wonder even Hegseth got in. What will it take to prove to you that these tactics do not work?
1